Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI), a significant concern in military populations, is associated with alterations in brain structure and function, cognition, as well as physical and psychological dysfunction. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is particularly sensitive to changes in brain structure following TBI, as alterations in white matter (WM) microstructure are common. However, dMRI studies in mild TBI (mTBI) are conflicting, likely due to relatively small samples, sample heterogeneity (demographics, pre- and comorbidities) and injury characteristics (mechanism; chronicity). Furthermore, few studies account for brain asymmetry, which may impact cognitive functions subserved by WM tracts. Examining brain asymmetry in large samples may increase sensitivity to detect heterogeneous areas of subtle WM alteration in mTBI.
Through the Enhancing Neuroimaging and Genetics through Meta-analysis (ENIGMA) Military-Relevant Brain Injury working group, we conducted a mega-analysis of neuroimaging and clinical data from 16 cohorts of Active Duty Service Members and Veterans (n=2,598; 2,321 males/277 females; age 19-85 years). 1,080 reported a deployment-related TBI, 480 had a history of only non-military-related TBI, 823 reported no history of TBI, and 215 did not differentiate between military and non-military TBI. dMRI data were processed in a harmonized manner along with harmonized demographic, injury, psychiatric, and cognitive measures. Hemispheric asymmetry of fractional anisotropy (FA, a common proxy for myelin organization) was calculated for 19 WM tracts and compared between those with and without TBI history.
FA in the cingulum showed greater asymmetry in individuals with a history of deployment-related TBI; this effect was driven by greater left lateralization in the group with TBI. There was a trend towards lower FA of the right cingulum in the TBI group. These results remained significant after accounting for potentially confounding variables including posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and handedness and were driven primarily by individuals who had sustained their worst TBI before age 40. We further found that alterations in the cingulum were associated with slower processing speed and poorer set shifting.
The results indicate an enhancement of the previously reported natural left laterality, possibly due to vulnerability of the non-dominant hemisphere or compensatory mechanisms in the dominant hemisphere. The cingulum is one of the last WM tracts to mature, reaching peak FA around 42 years old. This effect was primarily detected in individuals whose worst injury occurred before age 40, suggesting that the protracted development of the cingulum may lead to increased vulnerability to insults, such as TBI.
Competing Interest Statement
The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army/Navy/Air Force, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government. IKK receives funding for a collaborative project and serves as a paid scientific advisor for Abbott. She receives royalties for book chapters. Her spouse is an employee at Siemens AG. PMT received a research grant from Biogen, Inc., for research unrelated to this manuscript.
Funding Statement
R61NS120249; K99NS096116; This work was supported by U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) award #13129004; VA RR and D IK2RX002922; VA R and D SPIRE Award; DOD PRARP; Dutch Ministry of Defence; R01AG058822; R01NS100973, DoD contract W81XWH-18-1-0413, a grant from the James J. and Sue Femino Foundation, a Hanson-Thorell Research Scholarship, the USC CURVE and SURE programs, and the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology; R01NS100952; European Research Council (ERC Starting Grant 804326); VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Service I01RX003443, I01RX003442; VA Health Services Research and Development Service Research Career Scientist Award IK6HX002608; This work was supported in part by Merit Review Award Number I01 CX001820 from the United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Sciences R and D (CSRD) Service; VA CSR and D Career Development Award VA Career Development Award 5IK2CX001508; VA CSR and D Career Development Award 1IK2CX001772-01; Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Centers, the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC; W81XWH-13-2-0025) and the Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC; PT108802-SC104835); U54EB020403; K99 MH119314 (NIMH); NARSAD 27786; I01 RX002174
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Each of the 18 ADNI DoD sites' Institutional Review Boards as detailed in https://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/DODADNI_Procedures_Manual_20170912.pdf gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board for Utrecht University Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Boards at Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, James A Haley VA Hospital, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, VA Portland Health Care System, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, and VA Boston Health Care System gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board for Baylor College of Medicine and Affiliated Hospitals gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Boards for Duke University and the Durham VA Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work The Institutional Review Board for Baylor College of Medicine and Affiliated Hospitals gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board for Baylor College of Medicine and Affiliated Hospitals gave ethical approval for this work. The INTRuST IRB gave ethical approval for this work. The Brooke Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board for the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board for Baylor College of Medicine and Affiliated Hospitals gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board for Baylor College of Medicine and Affiliated Hospitals gave ethical approval for this work. The Minneapolis VA Health Care System Institutional Review Board gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Boards for Boston University and the University of California, San Diego gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Researchers interested in accessing the data described here must first join the ENIGMA Military-Relevant Brain Injury group and agree to abide by the Memorandum of Understanding governing data sharing and authorship. All projects are opt-in, so the specific cohorts available will differ.
