ABSTRACT
Introduction The humoral response to vaccines is the most used tool to evaluate the protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Dialysis patients are a high-risk population and have a reduced immune response to vaccination.
Objective To assess the humoral response to homologous Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) and heterologous Sputnik V/mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccination in dialysis patients.
Methods SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG (RBD) concentration was estimated 3-16 weeks after complete vaccination. Reactogenicity was evaluated until day 7 by patients’ s self-reported side events.
Results 107 participants were enrolled [n=84 homologous (SpV/SpV), n=23 heterologous (SpV/Mod)]. Median (IQR) age was 64 (50-75) years old and 79 (73.8%) were male. Additionally, 19 (22.6%) of the SpV/SpV and 4 (17.4%) of the SpV/Mod group had a prior confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (p=0.589). In the overall population, 103 patients reached seroconversion (96.3%). Anti-S-RBD IgG median titers (IQR) were higher in the heterologous [1222 (288-5680) BAU/mL] than in the homologous scheme [447 (100-1551) BAU/mL], p=0.022. In a linear model adjusted for age and gender, previous SARS-COV-2 infection (B: 1944.3; CI95: 1136.2-2753.4; p<0.001), and SpV/Mod vaccination scheme (B: 1241.5; CI95: 420.39-2062.6; p=0.003) were independently associated with anti-S-RBD levels. Finally, a higher frequency of adverse effects was associated with the heterologous scheme, although they were well tolerated by all individuals.
Conclusion The present study provides evidence that the homologous SpV/SpV and heterologous SpV/Mod schemes showed good efficacy and safety under dialysis conditions. These results could be useful for future vaccination strategies, especially aimed at this risk group.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was designed and performed according to the Helsinki declaration and all participants gave their written informed consent (Study protocol EX-2021-06438339-UBA DME#SSA_FFYB, Ethics committee of the Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquimica, Universidad de Buenos Aires).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Introduction: The humoral response to vaccines is the most used tool to evaluate the protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Dialysis patients are a high-risk population and have a reduced immune response to vaccination. Objective: To assess the humoral response to homologous Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) and heterologous Sputnik V/mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccination in dialysis patients. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG (RBD) concentration was estimated 3-16 weeks after complete vaccination. Reactogenicity was evaluated until day 7 by patients self-reported side events. Results: 107 participants were enrolled [n=84 homologous (SpV/SpV), n=23 heterologous (SpV/Mod)]. Median (IQR) age was 64 (50-75) years old and 79 (73.8%) were male. Additionally, 19 (22.6%) of the SpV/SpV and 4 (17.4%) of the SpV/Mod group had a prior confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (p=0.589). In the overall population, 103 patients reached seroconversion (96.3%). Anti-S-RBD IgG median titers (IQR) were higher in the heterologous [1222 (288-5680) BAU/mL] than in the homologous scheme [447 (100-1551) BAU/mL], p=0.022. In a linear model adjusted for age and gender, previous SARS-COV-2 infection (B: 1944.3; CI95: 1136.2-2753.4; p<0.001), and SpV/Mod vaccination scheme (B: 1241.5; CI95: 420.39-2062.6; p=0.003) were independently associated with anti-S-RBD levels. Finally, a higher frequency of adverse effects was associated with the heterologous scheme, although they were well tolerated by all individuals. Conclusion: The present study provides evidence that the homologous SpV/SpV and heterologous SpV/Mod schemes showed good efficacy and safety under dialysis conditions. These results could be useful for future vaccination strategies, especially aimed at this risk group.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
