Abstract
Puberty is linked to mental health problems during adolescence, and in particular, the timing of puberty is thought to be an important risk factor. This study developed a new measure of pubertal timing using multiple pubertal features and nonlinear associations with age and investigated its association with mental health problems. Using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort, we implemented three models of pubertal timing by predicting chronological age from i) observed physical development, ii) hormones (testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA]), and iii) a combination of the two, using a supervised machine learning method (n ∼9,900). Accuracy of the new models, and their associations with mental health problems were evaluated. The new pubertal timing measure performed better in capturing age variance compared to a commonly used method, and the physical measure accounted for more variance in mental health, such that earlier pubertal timing was associated with higher symptoms. This study demonstrates the utility for a new model of pubertal timing and suggests that physical maturation may play a predominant role in predicting mental health problems in early adolescence.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Niousha Dehestani was supported by a Deakin University Postgraduate Research Scholarships (DUPRS). Additionally, this study was supported by the MASSIVE high-performance computing facility (www.massive.org.au).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study used openly available datasets from Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org/)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵6 These authors jointly supervised this work: Sarah Whittle and Timothy J. Silk
Method Section, Supplemental information and figures are updated.
Data Availability
This study used data from Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). This is a longitudinal study which collected data from ~ 11000 children in age 9-10 and follow them through 10 years. A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html. A listing of participating sites and a complete listing of the study investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/scientists/workgroups/. ABCD consortium investigators designed and implemented the study and/or provided data but did not participate in the analysis or writing of this report. This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the NIH or ABCD consortium investigators.
