Abstract
Background With its proven effectiveness, indoor residual spraying (IRS) as a malaria vector control strategy form one of the reliable vector control strategies, especially when at least 80% of the population is covered. However, to date, there is uncertainty regarding the consequences of IRS withdrawal on malaria control when there’s no clear exit strategy in place. Therefore, there is need to comprehensively update literature regarding malaria burden indicators when IRS is withdrawn following sustained use.
Methods This protocol follows the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a systematic search of studies published between 2000 and 2022 in CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, ProQuest, PsychInfo, Scopus and OpenGrey. Using pre-set eligibility criteria, studies will be used to identify the relevant ones by two independent reviewers. Title/ abstracts will first be screened and potentially eligible ones screened using their full-text publications. Any conflicts/ discrepancies at the two stages will be resolved through regular discussion sessions. Included studies will be extracted to capture study & patient characteristics and relevant outcomes (malaria incidence and malaria vector abundance). Relevant tools will be used to assess the risk of bias in the studies measuring the impact of withdrawal. A meta-analysis will be performed, if sufficient homogeneity exists; otherwise, data arising will be presented using tables and by employing narrative synthesis techniques. Heterogeneity will be assessed using a combination of visual inspection of the forest plot along with consideration of the chi-square test and I-square statistic results.
Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not applicable for this study since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. Furthermore, this systematic review will inform the design of exit strategies for IRS-based programs in malaria endemic areas.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42022310655
Strengths and limitations of this study To the strength of this study, we hope to produce the first systematic review of the impact of IRS withdrawal comprehensively. Such comprehension will be defined by including studies from different settings, among different age groups and studies assessing malaria burden indicators either among human populations or mosquito populations or both. This review also utilizes systematic and transparent rigorous procedures guided by the Cochrane handbook and will report results as stated by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Furthermore, an experienced information specialist designed the search strategy and customized it to the different data bases that we intend to search. We anticipate some anticipations. In this systematic review, the certainty of the evidence could be limited by few numbers of publications and low quality of studies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This being a systematic review protocol, no data have been produced.
