Abstract
Background Assessing the quality of antenatal care (ANC) is imperative for improving care provisions during pregnancy to ensure the health of mother and baby. In Bangladesh, there is a dearth of research on the quality of ANC using nationally representative data to understand its levels and determinants. The current study aims to assess the quality of ANC and identify the sociodemographic factors associated with the usage of quality ANC services in Bangladesh.
Methods We conducted secondary data analysis using the last two Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (BDHS) (2014 and 2017–18). A total of 8,277 ever-married women were included in the analysis (3,631 from 2014 and 4,646 from 2017–18 BDHS). We constructed the quality ANC index using a principal component analysis on different ANC components: weight, blood pressure measurement, blood and urine tests, counseling about pregnancy complications and a minimum of four ANC visits of which one is by a medically trained provider. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine the strength of association.
Results Receiving all the six components of quality ANC increased from about 13% in 2014 (BDHS 2014) to 18% in 2017/18 (BDHS 2017–18) with a significant difference of p < 0.001. Women from the poorest group, being rural areas, with no education, high birth order and unexposed to media were less likely to receive high-quality ANC than women from the richest group, from urban areas, with a higher level of education, low birth order and exposure to media.
Conclusion There is a need to improve the quality of ANC services in Bangladesh. An education program for women, with regular knowledge-enhancing sessions for pregnant mothers, may help them understand the value of ANC visits. Documentaries about maternal and child healthcare can be broadcast on television, YouTube, Facebook, radio and other digital platforms regularly.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We used secondary dataset collected by National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Bangladesh, and Monitoring and Evaluation to Assess and Use Results Demographic and Health Surveys (MEASURE DHS). We obtained permission from the DHS program to use this data. This data can be downloaded from https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data set can be found from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) program website URL: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm
