Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol

Amy Seal Cecchini, View ORCID ProfileKaren McCulloch, Courtney Harrison, Oleg Favorov, Maria Davila, Wanqing Zhang, Julianna Prim, CDR Michael Krok
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.06.22276042
Amy Seal Cecchini
1The Geneva Foundation, Womack Army Medical Center, Ft. Bragg, NC
PT, DPT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen McCulloch
2The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Human Movement Science, Division of Physical Therapy, Chapel Hill, NC
PT, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karen McCulloch
  • For correspondence: kmac{at}med.unc.edu
Courtney Harrison
2The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Human Movement Science, Division of Physical Therapy, Chapel Hill, NC
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oleg Favorov
3The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chapel Hill, NC
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Davila
4Research Triangle Institue, Research Triangle Park, NC
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wanqing Zhang
2The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Human Movement Science, Division of Physical Therapy, Chapel Hill, NC
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julianna Prim
5The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Psychiatry, Chapel Hill, NC
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CDR Michael Krok
6Womack Army Medical Center Intrepid Spirit Clinic, Ft. Bragg, NC
PT, DPT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Physical Therapists affiliated with Intrepid Spirit Centers evaluate and treat Active Duty Service Members (ADSM) who have duty-limiting post-concussion symptoms to improve the ability to perform challenging tasks associated with military service. The Complex Assessment of Military Performance (CAMP) is a test battery that more closely approximates the occupational demands of ADSM without specific adherence to a particular branch of service or military occupational specialty. Subtasks were developed with military collaborators to include high level skills that all service members must be able to perform such as reacting quickly, maintaining visual stability while moving and changing positions, and scanning for, noting, and/or remembering operationally relevant information under conditions of physical exertion.

Objective The purpose of this observational longitudinal study is to: 1- validate each component of the 3-task CAMP test battery; 2- examine responsivenss of the measures to change after participation in Physical Therapy; 3- develop reference values for clinical interpretation; and 4 - develop materials for clinical dissemination. This ongoing multi-site study is currently funded through the CDMRP and has been approved by the Naval Medical Center Portsmouth IRB.

Methods ADSM undergoing post-concussion rehabilitation at the Intrepid Spirit Centers will be tested within one week of their initial Physical Therapy evaluation and after completing Physical Therapy. Control participants will include males, females, and ADSM from the Special Operations community. Participants will complete an intake form that includes questions about demographics, military service, deployment and concussion history, and profile and duty status. Other measures include those that explore concussion symptoms, sleep quality, post-traumatic stress, and perceptions of resilience.

The CAMP includes three separate 10-15 minute tasks. Movement is recorded by wearable inertial sensors and heart rate variability is recorded with a POLAR10 monitor. The “Run-Roll” task requires rapid position changes, combat rolls and quick running forwards and backwards while carrying a simulated weapon. Visual stability before and after the task is also performed. The “Dual-Task Agility” task includes rapid running with and without a weighted vest and a working memory task. The “Patrol Exertion” task requires repeated stepping onto an exercise step while watching a virtual patrol video. Additional tasks include monitoring direction of travel, observing for signs of enemy presence, and reacting to multiple auditory signals embedded in the video.

Discussion Measures that evaluate relevant skills are vital to support safe return to duty for ADSM who may be exposed to imminent danger as part of training or mission demands. The CAMP is designed to be an ecologically valid and clinically feasible assessment that may be more sensitive to capturing subtle impairments that impact duty performance as test skills are integrated into dual and multi-tasks that reflect occupational demands. Assessment results may serve as a more robust indicator of readiness for full return to duty after concussion.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funding for this study was awarded to KM by The Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program, Psychological Health/Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program, Complex Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Award (W81XWH-19-2-0046). https://cdmrp.army.mil/tbiphrp/default The funders did not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved via the Navy Medical Center Portsmouth IRB, with local approvals at Navy Medical Center Camp Lejeune, Madigan Army Medical Center, and Womack Army Medical Center (RHC-A 20-045).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Not Applicable

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Not Applicable

Footnotes

  • The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

  • Funding: Support for the Complex Assessment of Military Performance was provided by the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program, Psychological Health/Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program, Complex Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Award (award no: W81XWH-19-2-0046). The project is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UL1TR002489. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the Department of Defense.

  • All de-identified data from this study will be shared with the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Register (FITBIR).

Data Availability

Deidentified research data will be made publicly available through the FITBIR repository when the study is completed and published.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 06, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol
Amy Seal Cecchini, Karen McCulloch, Courtney Harrison, Oleg Favorov, Maria Davila, Wanqing Zhang, Julianna Prim, CDR Michael Krok
medRxiv 2022.06.06.22276042; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.06.22276042
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol
Amy Seal Cecchini, Karen McCulloch, Courtney Harrison, Oleg Favorov, Maria Davila, Wanqing Zhang, Julianna Prim, CDR Michael Krok
medRxiv 2022.06.06.22276042; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.06.22276042

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)