ABSTRACT
Background Visual hallucinations are often considered by clinicians to be suggestive of a secondary cause of psychosis, however, this association has never been assessed meta-analytically. We aimed to compare the presence of visual hallucinations in patients with psychosis due to a primary or secondary cause.
Method A meta-analysis of case-control studies directly comparing primary and secondary psychosis was conducted. PubMed, OVID, MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and Global Health databases were searched without date restrictions. Two researchers performed the search independently. The inclusion criteria were studies that reported the frequency of visual hallucinations in patients with primary and secondary psychosis and were published in English. A random-effects model, following the DerSimonian and Laird method, was used to pool studies and generate overall odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results Fourteen studies (904 primary and 804 secondary psychosis patients) were included. Visual hallucinations were significantly associated with secondary psychosis (OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.7-5.1, p<0.001) with moderate between-study heterogeneity (I2=70%). Subgroup analysis by type of secondary psychosis (organic, drug-induced, mixed) was non-significant. Analysis of the content of visual hallucinations (51 primary and 142 secondary psychosis patients) found hallucinations of inanimate objects more likely to be associated with secondary psychosis (OR = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.01-0.8, p=0.03).
Conclusions Visual hallucinations were found to be strongly associated with a secondary cause of psychosis. The presence of visual hallucinations in a patient presenting with psychosis may serve as a potential ‘red flag’ for a secondary cause and warrant further investigation.
What is already known Psychotic symptoms may arise due to either an idiopathic primary (‘non-organic’) disorder or a secondary cause, such as an underlying medical (‘organic’) disorder. Whilst it is widely accepted amongst clinicians that visual hallucinations are associated with a secondary psychosis, this has never been established meta analytically.
What this study adds Patients with a secondary cause of psychosis are approximately three times more likely to experience visual hallucinations than patients with a primary psychiatric disorder. The content of visual hallucinations in patients with a secondary cause also differs compared to patient with a primary cause.
How this study might affect practice Findings provide the strongest evidence to date for routinely assessing patients for the presence of visual hallucinations as part of the standard psychiatric assessment. A positive finding should be considered a ‘red flag’ for a secondary cause.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://osf.io/j9twg/?view_only=5c0f63cccd574239aca07bccdae35f3c
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was based on publically available data. See supplementary materials.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Joint first authors
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
https://osf.io/j9twg/?view_only=5c0f63cccd574239aca07bccdae35f3c
