Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

“Public attitudes to sharing government data with private industry: a systematic scoping review”

Jackie Street, Stacy Carter, View ORCID ProfileBelinda Fabrianesi, View ORCID ProfileRebecca Bosward, View ORCID ProfileLucy Carolan, View ORCID ProfileAnnette Braunack-Mayer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.07.22276084
Jackie Street
1ACHEEV, School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stacy Carter
1ACHEEV, School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Belinda Fabrianesi
1ACHEEV, School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Belinda Fabrianesi
Rebecca Bosward
1ACHEEV, School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rebecca Bosward
Lucy Carolan
1ACHEEV, School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lucy Carolan
  • For correspondence: lengland{at}uow.edu.au abmayer{at}uow.edu.au
Annette Braunack-Mayer
6ACHEEV, Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Annette Braunack-Mayer
  • For correspondence: lengland{at}uow.edu.au abmayer{at}uow.edu.au
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Linking and analysing large volumes of health data in electronic records, datasets, registries and biobanks can provide detailed insights into the health profiles of individuals, communities, regions and national populations. Good governance for data sharing can be challenging, particularly when private sector organisations are the recipients of public sector data. Many jurisdictions have responded by instituting new regulations and laws related to data protection, responding to calls to promote data sharing and manage associated risks. This review integrates and interprets five years of research on public and patient perspectives on sharing publicly-held health data with private industry for research and development. Our review question was: what are community attitudes towards the use of government administrative health data by private industry organisations for therapeutic development?

Methods We developed two logic grids: first, used terms describing citizens or patients, big data, private health sector and views or perspectives, second, used terms describing big data, social licence and public interest. We conducted a systematic literature search using electronic databases; PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science. Searches were conducted using Google Advanced and Google Scholar to identify grey literature

Results A total of 6,788 articles were screened based on title and abstract. Full text screening was conducted for 224 articles and a total of 33 publications were identified. Across all studies, support for sharing administrative health data with private sector organisations was low. Background knowledge and lack of trust that data use would lead to public benefit were the most important reasons for low level of support.

Conclusion Policymakers, data custodians and companies will need to establish robust safeguards including secure storage, anonymisation, monitoring and independent oversight, and institute and implement sanctions on misuse, if they are to secure legitimacy to share publicly-held health data with private industry for research and development.

Registration none available.

‘Contributions to the literature’

  • Research shows governance for data sharing is challenging, particularly when private sector organisations are the recipients of public sector data. Globally jurisdictions have responded by instituting new regulations and laws related to data protection, data sharing and the associated risks.

  • Bringing together research on ‘public attitudes towards the use of linked government administrative data by private sector organisations for therapeutic development’, this systematic review found that public support for sharing was low.

  • These findings highlight key areas for policymakers, data custodians and companies to address before they can legitimately share publicly-held health data with private industry for research and development.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • streetj{at}uow.edu.au

  • stacyc{at}uow.edu.au

  • belindaf{at}uow.edu.au

  • rbosward{at}uow.edu.au

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 08, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
“Public attitudes to sharing government data with private industry: a systematic scoping review”
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
“Public attitudes to sharing government data with private industry: a systematic scoping review”
Jackie Street, Stacy Carter, Belinda Fabrianesi, Rebecca Bosward, Lucy Carolan, Annette Braunack-Mayer
medRxiv 2022.06.07.22276084; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.07.22276084
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
“Public attitudes to sharing government data with private industry: a systematic scoping review”
Jackie Street, Stacy Carter, Belinda Fabrianesi, Rebecca Bosward, Lucy Carolan, Annette Braunack-Mayer
medRxiv 2022.06.07.22276084; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.07.22276084

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)