Abstract
Objective The aim of this research was to create a scale to assess the competency of therapists who conduct group cognitive behavioral therapy (G-CBT), which can serve as a tool to aid the continued training of therapists.
Methods Three stepped studies were conducted. Study 1: Through literature review and experts’ consensus process, essential skills for G-CBT were articulated and were categorized according to the criteria of the Cognitive Therapy Scale, a well-established rating scale to evaluate clinicians’ skills in individual cognitive behavioral therapy. The list of those skills was organized into a rating scale. Study 2: Behavioral anchors were added to each skill and were classified by the levels of difficulty (beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels), based on the rating by G-CBT experts. Study 3: Interrater reliability and validity of the rating scale were examined in a sample of forty-one videotaped G-CBT sessions of actual clinical sessions and educational role-plays.
Results A twelve-item Group Cognitive Therapy Scale was developed. It consists of eleven items that have been adopted from the original Cognitive Therapy Scale, with the addition of a new item called “Intervention Using Relationships with Other Participants.” This scale showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.95), satisfactory inter-rater reliability (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.65 - 0.88), and high predictive validity.
Conclusion A novel rating scale to evaluate therapists’ competency in G-CBT was developed and successfully validated.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Hospital Organization Hizen Psychiatric Medical Center (approval number: 28-7). The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
Data are available from the authors for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
