ABSTRACT
The absence of an objective disease biomarker puts studies of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) under the curse of imperfect diagnosis. This problem leads to frequent reports that fail to reproduce prior published studies. To address the impact of imperfect diagnosis on the robustness of studies’ conclusions, we conducted a simulation study to quantify the statistical power to detect a disease association with a hypothetical binary factor in the presence of imperfect diagnosis. Using the classical case-control design, studies with sample sizes of less than 500 individuals per group could not reach the target power of at least 80% to detect realistic disease associations. We then recreated serological association studies in which the chance of imperfect diagnosis was combined with the probability of misclassifying a binary factor, as it happens in a typical serological association study. In this case, the target power of 80% could only be achieved for studies with more than 1000 individuals per group. Given the current sample sizes of ME/CFS studies, our results suggest that most studies are likely to be underpowered due to imperfect diagnosis alone. To increase reproducibility across studies, we provided some practical recommendations, such as the use of standard case definitions together with multi-centric study designs, and routine reporting of power calculations under a non-negligible chance of misdiagnosis. Our results can also inform the design of future studies under the assumption of misdiagnosis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
JM acknowledges funding from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal (grant ref. SFRH/BD/149758/2019). NS acknowledges funding from the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal (ref. UIDB/00006/2020), and the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange, Poland (ref. PPN/ULM/2020/1/00069/U/00001).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used simulated data and openly available human data that were originally located at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00578 and https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00796
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The source code and datasets generated can be found in the GitHub public repository (https://github.com/jtmalato/misclassification-simulations).
