Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking in Pregnancy: Are they cost-effective?

Nicola McMeekin, Lesley Sinclair, Lyn Robinson-Smith, Alex Mitchell, Linda Bauld, David M Tappin, Kathleen A Boyd
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.21.22276693
Nicola McMeekin
1Health Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nicola.mcmeekin{at}glasgow.ac.uk
Lesley Sinclair
2York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lyn Robinson-Smith
2York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Mitchell
2York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Bauld
3Usher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M Tappin
4Scottish Cot Death Trust, West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, Glasgow G3 8SJ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen A Boyd
1Health Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Aims To evaluate whether adding financial incentives to usual care is cost-effective in encouraging pregnant women to quit tobacco smoking, compared to usual care alone.

Design Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA) from a healthcare provider’s perspective, embedded in the Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT III). Long-term analyses were conducted from the same perspective, using an existing Markov model over a lifetime horizon.

Setting Seven maternity smoking cessation sites in Scotland, England and Northern Ireland in the United Kingdom.

Participants In the short-term analysis CPIT III participants were assessed: women 16 years or older, self-reporting as smokers, less than 24 weeks pregnant and English speaking (n=944). The same population was used for the lifetime analysis, plus their infants.

Measurements Costs include financial incentive vouchers and postage, cessation support and nicotine replacement therapy and neonatal stays. The outcome measure was biochemically verified quit rate for the CEA and quality adjusted life-years (QALY) for CUA. Costs are presented in 2020 GBP sterling (£).

Data for the lifetime analysis came from the trial and was combined with data from published literature embedded in the model, reporting incremental cost per quitter and QALY. A 3.5% discount rate was applied.

Findings The short-term incremental cost per quitter was £4,400, uncertainty in QALY gains resulted in a cost per QALY of £150,000. Results of sensitivity analyses confirm these results. The long-term analysis combined costs and outcomes for mother and infants, results show a cost saving of £37 (-£35 to £106) and increase in QALYs of 0.171 (0.124 to 0.229). These findings indicate that, over a lifetime, financial incentives are cost saving and improve health outcomes.

Conclusions Offering up to £400 financial incentives, in addition to usual care, to support pregnant women to stop smoking is cost-effective over a lifetime for mother and infants.

Ethics Ethics approval received from NHS West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee-2, August 2017.

Registration details Trial registration number: ISRCTN15236311, date registered 09/10/2017 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15236311

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

ISRCTN15236311

Clinical Protocols

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33109658/

Funding Statement

Cancer Research UK (C48006/A20863), Chief Scientist Office Scottish Government (HIPS/16/1), Health and Social Care Services Northern Ireland (COM/5352/17), Chest Heart & Stroke Northern Ireland (2019_09), Lullaby Trust (272), Scottish Cot Death Trust (no reference available), Public Health Agency NI (no reference available).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

NHS West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee-2 gave ethical approval for this work in August 2017.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15236311 date registered 09/10/2017 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15236311

  • Declaration of competing interest Nicola Mcmeekin: I declare grant funding from Chief Scientists Office and Cancer Research UK for the CPIT III project (research time).

  • Lesley Sinclair: I declare grant funding from Cancer Research UK for the CPIT III project (named researcher).

  • Lyn Robinson-Smith: I declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Alex Mitchell: I declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Linda Bauld: I declare grant funding from Chief Scientists Office for the CPIT III project (research time). I am also co-chair of the Smoking in Pregnancy Challenge Group (England) and (since Sept 2021) Chief Social Policy Adviser to the Scottish Government.

  • David Tappin: I declare grant funding from Chief Scientists Office and Cancer Research UK for the CPIT III project.

  • Kathleen A Boyd: I declare grant funding from Chief Scientists Office and Cancer Research UK for the CPIT III project (funding research time).

  • lesley.sinclair{at}york.ac.uk

  • lyn.robinson-smith{at}york.ac.uk

  • alex.mitchell{at}york.ac.uk

  • linda.bauld{at}ed.ac.uk

  • david.tappin{at}glasgow.ac.uk

  • kathleen.boyd{at}glasgow.ac.uk

Data Availability

All requests for data should be submitted to NM (nicola.mcmeekin{at}glasgow.ac.uk) for consideration. Access to anonymised data may be granted following review by the Trial Management Group and agreement of NM and DT. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 22, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking in Pregnancy: Are they cost-effective?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking in Pregnancy: Are they cost-effective?
Nicola McMeekin, Lesley Sinclair, Lyn Robinson-Smith, Alex Mitchell, Linda Bauld, David M Tappin, Kathleen A Boyd
medRxiv 2022.06.21.22276693; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.21.22276693
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking in Pregnancy: Are they cost-effective?
Nicola McMeekin, Lesley Sinclair, Lyn Robinson-Smith, Alex Mitchell, Linda Bauld, David M Tappin, Kathleen A Boyd
medRxiv 2022.06.21.22276693; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.21.22276693

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Economics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)