Abstract
Digital technologies for health care may lower costs while enhancing access to services. However, concerns have been raised that digital care may lead to over-use of services and not be as effective as in-person visits. Previous studies have found varying effects across different contexts, study designs, and outcome measures. This study contributes to the emerging evidence on the effects of digital care on primary care utilization by developing a conceptual model for primary care use and then comparing the effects of digital primary care with in-person visits and telephone contacts. Register data from Sweden over a two-year period (2017-2018) in a sample of patients diagnosed with an infection are used to describe the effects. Findings show that the majority of patients require a single consultation across either model of care. A relatively small share of patients makes multiple consultations per episode of care both across and within models of care. Compared with in-person visits and telephone contacts, digital care is associated with fewer consultations per episode of care and involve lower rates of laboratory tests and antibiotic prescriptions. Digital care is provided by a physician to a larger extent compared with the other models of care in the current sample. Further analysis will be conducted to establish any causal effects of digital primary contacts on identified outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare (Forte; grant number 2018-00093).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Swedish Ethical Review Authority gave ethical approval for this work (2019-01500; 2019-03-20).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
