Early detection of mandible osteoradionecrosis risk in a high comorbidity Veteran population

Introduction

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the craniofacial skeleton is a feared complication of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) that can lead to devastating health effects for patients treated for a diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).¹ Precise definitions vary, but all describe an area of chronically exposed bone in the irradiated field that does not heal in the absence of recurrent neoplastic disease.² The pathophysiology of ORN was once believed to stem from a triad of radiation, trauma, and infection.³ Reports of the development of disease in the absence of one or more of these factors prompted investigation of other explanations.⁴ Revised theories on the etiology of ORN take into consideration a multifactorial generation of tissue hypoxia stemming from small vessel compromise and hypocellularity along with induction of fibrosis by reactive oxygen species as a late complication of high dose radiation leading to replacement of parenchymal tissue with dense extracellular matrix. Imaging studies conducted by the Joint Head and Neck Radiotherapy-MRI Development Cooperative at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and collaborating institutions strongly support a hypothesis of radiation-altered bone vascularity as a critical contributor to ORN development.^5-7

Reported ORN rates range from 0-16%.^8-10 This discrepancy in disease incidence may be partially explained by the evolution of radiation delivery from three dimensional conformal strategies to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which can deliver comparable doses to tumors with lower radiation delivery to surrounding tissues.¹¹ This assumption, though widely described, is challenged by several retrospective analyses.^10,12 Although more conformal radiation planning would be expected to provide improved bone sparing, it is unclear whether or not any dose conformation can spare the ipsilateral body and angle of the mandible for oropharyngeal tumors with concomitant nodal disease.¹³ It is therefore unlikely that technical improvements in dose delivery alone can eliminate ORN risk, particularly in high risk patient populations with a high comorbidity burden that could impact soft tissue and bony healing.^14,15.

For the current analysis we leveraged a tracking tool of treatment delivery for high-comorbidity (complicated diabetes mellitus, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease)^16,17, high-risk Veterans with a diagnosis of HNSCC as previously reported by our group.¹⁸ We sought to characterize the incidence of ORN at a tertiary Veterans Health Administration (VHA) institution with on-site Dental and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery services integrated into a multi-disciplinary treatment planning group and identify correlates of ORN development.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from an institutional cohort of patients treated with curative intent EBRT for HNSCC in the definitive or adjuvant setting. Following approval from Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC) Institutional Review Boards, we reviewed the records of patients who were diagnosed and initiated radiation therapy at the MEDVAMC between January 2016 and December 2020 captured in our treatment tracking registry.¹⁸ Patient demographics, dental records and procedures, tumor and treatment characteristics, and data pertaining to the development and treatment of ORN were retrospectively obtained from the existing electronic medical record and the registry. T, N, M classification were recorded according to the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC Staging Manual 8^th Edition) staging system. Associations between clinical variables and the development of ORN were investigated using two-directional Fisher’s exact tests for nominal and Mann-Whitney U for ordinal data. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was calculated using criteria published by Charlson et al.¹⁹

Results

ORN development

The overall rate of development of ORN in our cohort was 4.27%. Of the 7 patients who developed ORN (Table 4), one had an oral cavity primary with the rest originating in the oropharynx and one p16+ SCC defined as a carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). The rate of ORN development by subsite was 3.7% for oral cavity, 8.1% for oropharynx, and 0% for hypopharyngeal and laryngeal tumors. The mean time from the start of EBRT to development of ORN was 196 days with a median of 156 days (range 127-368 days). All 7 patients had involvement of the mandible and all patients with known primary tumor laterality had involvement of the ipsilateral mandible (Figure 1). Six patients had radiographic evidence of ORN at the time of clinical appearance; four patients demonstrated significant bony erosion (Figure 2) Five were smokers with an average of 47.2 pack years; 1 patient continued to smoke during EBRT. Three had documented complications with pre-radiation dental extractions with exposed bone that slowly re-mucosalized prior to initiation of treatment.

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 4.

ORN cases

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Radiation plan for oropharyngeal cancer.

Dosimetric plan for T4N2M0 OPSCC which developed right mandibular ORN. Approximately 75% of the mandibular volume falls within 56Gy dose and approximately 90% falls within 35Gy dose.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. ORN development.

A) Erosion of the mandibular body, reconstructed using a fibular free flap. B) Operative planning for reconstruction. C) Imaging of reconstructed mandible. D-F) Bony erosion at the time of diagnosis.

Discussion

Over the last three decades, a new epidemic of human papilloma virus (HPV) driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has changed the landscape of patients receiving head and neck EBRT.²⁰ This has led to both increasing numbers of patients receiving EBRT at time of diagnosis, as well as more patients surviving long enough to be effected by late complications of this therapy.^21,22 It is now clear that HPV+OPSCC patients are generally younger and healthier compared to their HPV-counterparts.²³ When superimposed on a substantially lower tobacco exposure, it is likely that HPV+OPSCC patients may constitute a “low-risk” cohort for EBRT related complications, particularly development of ORN.²¹ In contrast, Veteran patients present not only with a disproportionately higher incidence of HPV-disease including OPSCC but a disproportionately higher comorbidity burden.^16,17,24-28 This is particularly relevant to ORN development which may be impacted by comorbidities for which Veterans are particularly enriched such as peripheral vascular disease and diabetes mellitus.^26,28

The overall rate of ORN in our cohort is within the range of reported incidence in the literature. As shown here, no patients with laryngeal SCC developed ORN, as would be expected with a fairly high complement of early-stage disease resulting in narrower radiation fields and complete sparing of the mandible. This finding is important because it has allowed us to tailor both our pre-treatment patient counseling and our post-EBRT bone surveillance algorithms accordingly. In contrast, 8% of patients with OPSCC developed ORN. Despite the promise of IMRT and even intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT), it is not technically possible to protect the mandible when delivering curative doses of radiation to the primary tumor and nodal areas.²⁹ Comparisons among patient cohorts therefore must account for primary disease site, subsite, and T- and N-classification as ORN rates are likely to be very significantly impacted by these parameters. In contrast to our cohort, many recent datasets are skewed towards less locally advanced disease.^30-32 A recent study from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center described an ORN rate of 13.7% among all HNSCC patients with a 5% rate of grade 4 ORN. A subset analysis generated for the current manuscript demonstrated that 123/826 oropharyngeal cancer patients (14.9%) developed all grade ORN and 42/825 (5.1%) developed grade 4 ORN.³³ In the current cohort, Veterans who developed ORN were more likely to have pre-EBRT extractions (Table 3). No other variables reached statistical significance (Tables 1, 3).

Given the high burden of comorbidities relevant to mandibular vascularity and tobacco exposure in our Veteran cohort, it is somewhat re-assuring to uncover an ORN rate within the reported literature range. A notable finding in our cohort is the short interval between the delivery of EBRT and the development of ORN (median time to ORN = 156 days). This is substantially more rapid that intervals reported in other studies.¹⁰ Although our median time to ORN is undoubtedly impacted by our short median follow up time as is the rate potentially, it is important to note that time to earliest ORN (127 days) is unlikely to change and strongly suggests the need for careful and proactive tracking of patients throughout both treatment delivery and the surveillance period following treatment completion.

A possible explanation for early ORN development is the underlying poor dental health of our patients. As previously stated, one of the factors that puts patients at highest risk for the development of ORN is the breakdown of barrier mechanisms from infection by the extraction of teeth in the irradiated field. All ORN patients were dentate pre-EBRT, underwent extractions and 3/7 developed post extraction complications. Perhaps either the poor pre-existing state of the mucosal and/or alveolar structures of the jaw or the maladaptive oral hygiene habits of our patients initiated a more rapid evolution of disease. A decreased time to insult of these local tissues could have started an earlier cascade of demucosalization and infection leading to bone death. Alternatively, since our HNSCC patients are tracked prospectively pre- and post-treatment, this time to development could in fact be more accurate compared to other purely retrospective analyses. All of our dentate HNSCC patients at the MEDVAMC undergo evaluation by the Dental and OMFS teams for optimization of oral health and possible extractions prior to initiation of radiation therapy. Although very few patients develop complications from extractions, these complications can result in treatment initiation delays and correlate with ORN risk. Nevertheless, because patients are tracked prospectively in real time, continued communication between the treatment teams can still minimize treatment delays and interruptions.

There are several limitations to the currently study, chiefly the sample size of patients enrolled. Although the MEDVAMC contains the highest volume Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Service Line within the VHA, a single institution study is inherently limited by a smaller number of patients that can be accrued compared to a multi-institutional study design. This limitation is magnified with the relative rarity of ORN. A second important consideration is the duration of or follow up period. Given that ORN is a late complication of EBRT, there are likely additional patients in our cohort that may go on to develop this disease in the future. This has possibly skewed our analysis of the interval of time from the initiation of EBRT to diagnosis of ORN as those with longer intervals would not be captured by our study. We believe that the most accurate risk modelling for ORN development will need to account for disease site (oral cavity and oropharynx with greatest ORN risk) and stage, overall dental status and health, radiation dose and also time from radiation in order to counsel patients in the most effective manner.