Abstract
Background Physical activity has been suggested as a protective factor against psychiatric symptoms. While numerous studies have focused on the magnitude of physical activity’s effect on psychiatric symptoms, few have examined the potential mechanisms.
Objective The current review aimed to synthesize scientific evidence of the mechanisms through which physical activity might reduce psychiatric symptoms across the lifespan.
Methods We included articles that were published before March 2022 from five electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane). A qualitative synthesis of studies was conducted. The risk of bias assessment was performed using The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews. Studies were included if they explored the possible mechanisms through which physical activity links with psychiatric symptoms (i.e., internalizing and externalizing symptoms) across the lifespan.
Results A total of 24 articles were included (three RCTs, four non-RCTs, four prospective longitudinal studies, and 13 cross-sectional studies). Overall, most of the studies (70%) focused on children, adolescents, and young adults. Our findings show that self-esteem, self-concept, and self-efficacy were the only consistent paths through which physical activity may influence psychiatric symptoms (specifically depressive and anxiety symptoms). There were insufficient studies to determine the role of neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms. Findings from our systematic review suggest that self-esteem, self-concept, and self-efficacy are potential paths through which physical activity might reduce psychiatric symptoms across the lifespan.
Conclusions Overall, future physical activity interventions with the purpose of improving mental health should consider these mechanisms to develop more effective interventions. Current literature gaps and recommendations for researchers to explore other potential mechanisms were also included.
Protocol Registration The protocol of this study was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42021239440) and published in April 2022.
Key Points
Self-esteem, self-concept, and self-efficacy are potential paths through which physical activity might reduce psychiatric symptoms (specifically depressive and anxiety symptoms) across the lifespan. Future studies should consider incorporating strategies to enhance these psychosocial mechanisms in physical activity interventions.
Few studies have examined the role of neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms. It is recommended that future research could focus on these areas.
Integrated studies that examine the combined and independent contributions of the neurobiological, psychosocial and behavioral mechanisms are needed to obtain the overall picture.
There is a lack of research on externalizing and other internalizing symptoms beside depressive and anxiety symptoms (e.g., somatic symptoms).
1. Introduction
According to Lancet Global Health (2020), approximately one billion people around the world are suffering from at least one mental disorder [1]. The economic loss that came as a result of this was estimated to be $2.5 trillion per year in 2010 and could potentially increase up to $6 trillion per year in 2030. It is, therefore, not surprising that mental health problems have an enormous impact on many aspects of our lives. While researchers and experts are looking into solutions to these problems, there is still an urgent need for better understanding of mental disorders and effective preventions.
Previous studies have shown that most mental health disorders have emerged in approximately 50% of individuals by the age of 18 [2]. Mental health disorders can be classified into externalising and internalising problems. Externalizing problems include disinhibited/externally-focused behavioral symptoms such as conduct problems, rule-breaking behavior, attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems [3]. Internalizing symptoms include over-inhibited/internally-focused symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms. Having externalizing and internalizing symptoms in childhood and adolescents can predict mental illnesses later in life [4]. Even though researchers have found many risk factors for internalizing and externalizing symptoms, less is known about their protective factors [5,6].
A growing body of research has identified physical activity as a potential protective factor against psychiatric symptoms and disorders [7]. Physical activity is defined as “any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscle that requires energy expenditure” [8] and has been widely studied due to its extensive health-related benefits [9]. For instance, previous research has demonstrated that physical activity has a small-to-moderate effect on mental health; however, the underlying mechanisms responsible for these effects are unclear [10–13]. Understanding the mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms will allow for better explanation and prediction, and for more effective interventions. This could stimulate the identification of cost-efficient alternative therapies for preventing mental illnesses of all ages.
In 2016, Lubans et al. proposed a conceptual model with three groups of mechanisms (i.e., neurobiological, psychosocial, and behavioral mechanisms) that may explain the effects of physical activity on mental health in children and adolescents [14]. They also performed a systematic review and identified a lack of available evidence [15]. However, their review only included intervention studies, and although this type of design can provide evidence for cause and effect, observational studies can also provide complementary information, particularly when there is a lack of experimental evidence. In adults, only narrative reviews [14–16] have explored the mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms. In particular, Stillman et al. [9] suggested that physical activity might reduce internalizing symptoms via psychosocial pathways such as mood. Additionally, Kandola et al. [17] proposed some biological (e.g., neuroplasticity, inflammation, or oxidative stress) and psychosocial (e.g., self-esteem or social support) mechanisms underlying the relationship between physical activity and depressive symptoms in adults. Nevertheless, no previous systematic review has synthesized the existing evidence in adults.
We aim to fill in the current literature gap by synthesizing the current findings and updating all relevant literature mapping the mechanisms through which physical activity might reduce psychiatric symptoms across the lifespan. In particular, we investigated the three broad categories of mechanisms (psychosocial, neurobiological, and behavioral) as suggested by Lubans et al. [14]. Additionally, we included both intervention and observational studies and we did not impose an age limit to allow for better generalization of our findings. The findings of our review may guide future research to develop more effective treatments and solutions to protect people against mental disorders.
2. Methods
Our reviewed adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [18]. The design of the present work was fully specified in advance. It was registered in the PROSPERO database with the registration number CRD42021239440. Further details on the protocol can be found elsewhere [19]. It was made publicly available before conducting the primary electronic search [19].
2.1 Search Strategy and Inclusion Criteria
We searched five electronic databases for relevant articles: Medline All via Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO via Ovid, Embase via Embase.com, and Cochrane CENTRAL via Wiley (see Online Supplemental Appendix for the full search strategies). Articles included for screening were published before March 2022 (date last searched). In brief, we included articles based on predefined criteria as summarized in the protocol [19]. Two reviewers (PTNH and THPB) screened the titles and abstracts of the articles separately and included articles based on the inclusion criteria [19]. Any disagreements were discussed and resolved between the two reviewers. Final decisions were made by a third reviewer (MR-A). The eligible articles were retrieved in full-text and screened again by the same reviewers to determine full eligibility.
The complete methodology, procedures and inclusion/exclusion criteria have been previously described [19]. Briefly, the inclusion criteria were: (1) including at least one group of healthy participants (i.e., no diagnosis of neuropsychogical disorders); (2) studies that explore the possible mechanisms through which physical activity links with psychiatric symptoms; (3) the outcome variable belongs to a psychiatric symptom, specifically an internalizing (i.e., depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms) or an externalizing (i.e., conduct problems, rule-breaking behavior, attention deficit/hyperactivity problems) symptom; (4) intervention studies (RCT, non-RCT) and observational studies (prospective longitudinal cohort studies, cross-sectional studies). An additional search for studies was performed by screening reference lists of included studies and their citations through Google Scholar. Lastly, we contacted an expert (DL) in the field to identify additional studies that may have been missed and any relevant ongoing or unpublished studies.
We did not include conference abstracts and other types of grey literature [20]. Studies that included professional athletes, animals, or only included participants with neuropsychological and/or physical disorders were excluded. Interestingly, our preliminary search showed that the majority of existing literature included behavioral mechanisms as independent variables rather than as potential mechanisms, which complicated the search and added more than 10,000 irrelevant articles. Therefore, to identify relevant articles for the behavioral mechanisms, we screened reference lists of the articles that we included in the current study and contacted an expert (DL) in the field.
2.2 Data extraction
Two researchers (PTNH and TT) extracted the data. This process was double-checked by one experienced researcher (MR-A). The from the eligible articles possible disagreements that occurred with the extraction were discussed by the researchers until a consensus was reached.
We used a standardized tool to obtain study background (title, author, year, country), sample characteristics (sample size, mean age, percentage of female participants), design (intervention [RCT or non-RCT], or observational [cross-sectional or longitudinal]), independent variables, dependent variables, mediating variables, instruments used to assess the variables, statistical analyses and software, confounders, and main findings. For intervention studies (RCTs and non-RCTs), the time length of intervention, description of the program, intensity, duration, and frequency were also extracted. For longitudinal studies, we also extracted years of follow-up.
2.3 Risk of bias
The risk of bias of each study was evaluated independently by two researchers (PTNH and TT). Any disagreements were resolved in a consensus meeting with the third researcher (MR-A). The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews (https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools) was used to assess the risk of bias. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews includes a checklist with specific criteria to assess the risk of bias for each study design. For each criterion, there are four possible options: “yes” (criterion met), “no” (criterion not met), “unclear” or “not applicable”. There are eight criteria items for cross-sectional studies, eleven criteria items for longitudinal (or cohort) studies, nine criteria items for non-RCTs (or quasi-experimental studies) and thirteen criteria items for RCTs. To classify the risk of bias, we used the method that was previously employed by Molina-Garcia et al. [21]. If at least 75% of the applicable items had been scored as “yes”, then the study was labeled as “low risk”. If less than 75% of the applicable items had been scored as “no”, then the study was as “high risk”. Any criteria item that was “not applicable” was included in the calculation of the percentage.
2.4 Data Synthesis
Findings were synthesized using a method that was previously employed by Sallis et al. [13,14,22]. If 0–33% of studies reported a statistically significant path (e.g., self-esteem) through which physical activity affect or be associated with any psychiatric symptoms, the result was classified as no association (Ø); if 34–59% of studies, or if fewer than four studies reported a significant path, the result was classified as being inconsistent/uncertain (?). Finally, if ≥ 60% of studies found a statistically significant path, the result was classified as significant (✓).
2.5 Modifications to the Initial Protocol
In April 2022, we published the protocol for the current study which outlined our plan to carry out the systematic review in details [19]. We originally planned to employ the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess the quality of the evidence across studies. One of the criteria of the GRADE framework is publication bias, which would require us to perform a meta-analysis [23]. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, we were unable to carry out a meta-analysis of the results, and hence, couldn’t employ the GRADE framework.
3. RESULTS
3.1 Selection process
The original search of five databases yielded 12,239 articles, 7,647 of which were identified as duplicates and removed before screening. There were 4,592 remaining articles to screen for titles and abstracts where 4,424 articles did not meet the inclusion criteria. This left us with 168 articles for the full-text screening. Out of 168 articles, only four articles were unretrievable. There were 149 articles which did not meet the inclusion criteria based on full-text screening (more details in Table S1). Five articles were included after screening the references of the studies that met the inclusion criteria. Finally, 24 articles were included in the review: Three RCT, four non-RCT, four prospective longitudinal studies, and 13 cross-sectional studies. Further details about the selection process are shown in Figure 1.
Flow diagram for study selection.
3.2 Summary of included studies
A detailed description of the studies included in the systematic review is provided in Table 1.
Summary of studies investigating the mediator of physical activity and psychiatric symptoms
3.2.1 Characteristics of included studies
The included studies have sample sizes ranging from 39 [24] to 14,594 [25]. Three studies included children [26–28], eight studies included adolescents [24,25,28–35], nine studies included young adults [24,32,33,36–40], six studies included adults [32,33,39–42], and six studies included elderly people [39,43–47].
3.2.2 Exposure characteristics
Out of 24 studies, four studies used sports participation [25–27,30], five studies used exercise [29,36,38,44,47], and 16 studies used physical activity as the predictor [24,28,30–35,37,39–43,45,46]. Three intervention studies included an active control group [36,44,46]. Within these studies, the experimental conditions included exergames [44], resistance and flexibility exercise [46], and cycling [36]. Three intervention studies did not have a control group; all participants had to participate in the same training program [34,43,47]. Session duration ranged from 30 minutes [36] to 60 minutes [43,44,47]. The frequency of the session per week ranged from one [44] to seven [47] times per week. Lastly, the overall duration of the interventions vary between four weeks [47] to 24 weeks [46].
3.2.3 Mechanism characteristics
Within the 17 studies that explored the psychosocial mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms, two studies used social support/connection [25,28], one study used body image [33], one study used self-criticism and self-enhancement [32], eight studies used self-esteem [24,25,31,35–37,40,46], four studies used self-concept [30,34,36,37], five studies used self-efficacy [24,36,39,41,44], one study used self-perception [24] and three studies used mood [24,39,44]. as the potential mechanisms of interest. Among the seven studies that explored the neurobiological mechanisms, one study used hippocampal volume [28], one study used white matter microstructure [26], one study used stress-induced biomarkers [29], one study used neurotransmitters [36], one study used hormones [43], two studies used inflammatory biomarkers [29,45], one study used epigenetics [47]. The two studies that explored behavioral mechanisms focused on sleep [41,42].
3.2.4 Outcomes characteristics
There were 22 studies that used depression as the outcome variable [24–31,33–36,38–46]. One study used the Profile of Mood Sates [43], three studies used the Center for Epidemiological Studies—Depression Scale [30,31,45], one study used the 18-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Study-Depression Scale [25], one study used the Affective Problems Scale of the Youth Self-Report [29], one study used the Korean version of Children’s Depression Inventory [35], three studies used the Child Behavior Checklist [26–28], two studies used the Beck Depression Inventory [36,38], one study used The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 LI, one study used the Geriatric Depression Scale [46], three studies used the Beck Depression Inventory-II [24,39,42], one used the Chinese version of the Beck Youth Inventories-Second Edition [34], one study used the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [41], one study used the Modified Beck Depression Inventory [33], one study used the Depression subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised [40], one study used the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [47]. One study also assessed the affective and somatic symptoms of depression [29].
Four studies used anxiety symptoms as the outcome variable [32,34,36,37]. In particular, one study used the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [36], one study used the short form of the State scale from the Charles Spielberger’s State - Trait Anxiety Inventory [32], one used the Chinese version of the Beck Youth Inventories - Second Edition [34], and the other one the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire [37].
3.3 Synthesis of findings
The qualitative synthesis of our findings was summarized in Table 2. Overall, there was consistent evidence for three mechanisms through which physical activity seems to have a link with psychiatric symptoms: self-esteem (eight out of 10 studies – 80%), self-concept (three out of four studies – 75%), and self-efficacy (three out of five studies – 60%). There were insufficient studies (less than four studies) to determine the role of social support, body image, self-criticism, self-enhancement, self-perception, mood, hippocampal volume, white matter microstructure, stress-induced markers, neurotransmitters, hormones, inflammatory markers, epigenetics, or sleep in the relationship between physical activity and psychiatric symptoms across the lifespan.
Qualitative synthesis
3.4 Risk of bias assessment
The details of the risk of bias assessment are included Tables S2-S9. The criteria to assess the risk of bias and the percentage of studies that met the criteria item-by-item is presented in Tables S2-S5. The risk of bias assessment study-by-study is presented in Tables S6-S9. First, all three RCTs showed high risk of bias [36,44,46]. Second, a high risk of bias was detected in two of the four non-RCTs [24,47]. Third, three out of four longitudinal studies showed low risk of bias [31,42,45]. Lastly, of the 13 cross-sectional studies, 11 showed high risk of bias [26–28,30,33,35,37–41], and two studies showed low risk of bias [25,32].
4. Discussion
The current systematic review aimed to synthesize research evidence on the mechanisms through which physical activity might reduce psychiatric symptoms across the lifespan. In brief, most of the studies focused on psychosocial mechanisms and consistently showed that self-esteem, self-concept, and self-efficacy are pathways through which physical activity reduces internalizing symptoms (i.e., depressive symptoms) in the healthy general population, and mainly in young people. We found that only a limited number of studies have explored the role of neurobiological (e.g., gray matter volume in the hippocampus) and behavioral (e.g., sleep) mechanisms in youth, making it difficult to obtain the overall picture. Therefore, future studies are encouraged to focus on: (i) exploring the neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms, and (ii) building a comprehensive and integrative model, that includes all potential mechanisms.
While a variety of psychosocial mechanisms were identified in this systematic review, only self-esteem, self-concept, and self-efficacy were consistently associated with physical activity and psychiatric symptoms. In brief, self-concept is understood as the beliefs and knowledge that we have about ourselves while self-esteem includes the evaluation and affect that we have regarding our self-concept [48]. On the other hand, self-efficacy is the belief in oneself to perform a certain action and achieving a particular result. Overall, our findings are in line with those from Kandola et al. (2019) and Lubans et al. (2016) who proposed that self-esteem may be a potential psychosocial mechanism through which physical activity can reduce depression [14,17]. More specifically, participation in physical activity may enhance one’s self-esteem through improving physical self-concept and body image perceptions, which in turn, might have a positive effect on psychiatric symptoms. While self-esteem has been often associated with depression, it could also play a role in symptoms of externalizing disorders such as risky behavior, aggression, and violence [48]. Therefore, future research might also investigate the role of self-esteem in reducing externalizing symptoms. Lastly, it was hypothesized that by doing physical activity, we will gain more confidence in our physical ability (i.e., perceived competence); hence, promote our self-efficacy. This improvement in self-efficacy will then generalize to other aspects and act against depressive symptoms. In addition to these mechanisms, other potential psychosocial mechanisms such as social support, mood and emotions may also mediate the relationship between physical activity and psychiatric symptoms [14,17]. For example, having a positive experience while doing physical activity may have a good influence on various psychosocial scales such as self-esteem, which in turn, affects mental health outcomes [49–51]. Indeed, some studies found evidence for other psychosocial outcomes (i.e., social connections, body image, self-criticism, self-enhancement, self-perception, and mood) [24,25,28,30,32,33,36,39,44]. However, there were not enough studies to draw strong conclusions. Accordingly, future research should focus on investigating these potential mechanisms and employing self-esteem, self-concept, and self-efficacy to develop effective physical activity interventions for mental health.
The role of the neurobiological mechanisms in the relationship between physical activity and psychiatric symptoms is unclear due to the inconsistencies and heterogeneity found between the included studies. For instance, some studies used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data as indicators of the neurobiological mechanisms while others included blood circulating neurobiological biomarkers [26,43]. Studies that used MRI data provided evidence for potential neurobiological mechanisms; however, the effects were inconsistent. Two studies that used the data from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, explored the role of brain structure in the relationship between physical activity and psychiatric symptoms in children [26,27]. Overall, they observed that hippocampal volume partly mediated the association of physical activity with depressive symptoms, but only in boys [27]. However, white matter microstructure in the fornix and parahippocampal cingulum did not mediate the relationship between physical activity and psychiatric symptoms during childhood [26]. It is notable that the sample size of the ABCD study was quite large and hence could result in more robust results than expected.
In healthy young individuals, neurobiological measurements in the form of blood circulating biomarkers could provide a more dynamic indication of the role of neurobiological mechanisms in the relationship between physical activity and psychiatric symptoms across the lifespan. For example, stress and inflammatory blood biomarkers, which have been previously linked to psychiatric symptoms, can be reduced by physical activity interventions [29,45]. Psychiatric disorders are often associated with elevated level of stress and inflammatory biomarkers while physical activity has an anti-inflammatory effect. It is possible, therefore, that stress and inflammatory biomarkers could be a potential mechanism through which physical activity reduces psychiatric symptoms [17]. Similarly, adrenal hormones and neurotransmitters, such as the serotonin, are other potential neurobiological mechanisms that might be stimulated by physical activity, and in turn reduce depressive symptoms [36,43]. Lastly, physical activity may also affect psychiatric symptoms through epigenetic mechanisms [52]. For instance, Liao et al. (2022) explored the possibility that BDNF methylation could mediate the effect of physical activity on depressive symptoms in older people and found some preliminary evidence for this hypothesis [47]. Overall, although there are promising and highly accepted neurobiological mechanisms in the field, we cannot establish any conclusion in this systematic review about their potential role in the relationship between physical activity and psychiatric symptoms across the lifespan.
In 2016, Lubans et al. [14] described a range of potential behavioral mechanisms (e.g., sleep, coping, and regulation skills) that may explain the effects of physical activity on mental health during childhood. However, they only identified two studies that had tested behavioral mechanisms. Similarly, we found a lack of relevant studies examining behavioral mechanisms because most studies understood behavioral mechanisms as independent predictors of psychiatric symptoms instead of potential paths. In this study, we found and included two studies that identified sleep as a potential path through which physical activity might reduce psychiatric symptoms in adults ([41,42]. Previous studies showed that physical activity has a beneficial effect on sleep, where it can improve sleep quality and duration; additionally, sleep is essential for recovery after doing physical activity [42,53]. Furthermore, the relationship between sleep and psychiatric disorders, particularly depression, could be bidirectional [54]. This means that sleep could be a consequence as well as a predictor of some psychiatric symptoms. Nevertheless, there were insufficient number of studies to draw firm conclusions.
4.1 Literature gaps and future research
While we aimed to investigate the mechanisms through which physical activity may influence externalizing and internalizing symptoms, we failed to identify any studies examining the effect of physical activity on externalising symptoms.
The variety of measurements available for assessing depressive and anxiety symptoms may pose as an obstacle for research and clinical application. Researchers should consider using similar measures when assessing symptoms of the same disorder.
Only three mechanisms (i.e., self-esteem, self-concept, self-efficacy) were sufficiently studied. Therefore, further research is needed to explore whether other psychosocial (e.g., social support), neurobiological and behavioral paths exist.
Since most studies focused on children and adolescents, there is a need for additional studies examining potential mechanisms in adult and elderly populations.
Integrated studies that examine the combined and independent contributions of neurobiological, psychosocial, and behavioral mechanisms are needed to obtain the overall picture.
4.2 Limitations and strengths
This review has a few limitations. First, conference abstracts and other types of grey literature were not included. Additionally, we only included articles published in English and did not perform a formal search for behavioral mechanisms due to feasibility reasons. Instead, we included articles that we found from screening the reference list of articles that met the inclusion criteria and contacted experts in the field. Finally, due to the heterogeneity of studies, we could not perform a meta-analysis. On the other hand, this review has a few strengths. We included participants of all ages and all types of studies. This review is an a priori study which was registered in the PROSPERO database [19]. We also followed the PRISMA guidelines for systematic review and included articles across five electronic databases Table S1.
5. Conclusion
Findings from our systematic review suggest that self-esteem, self-concept, and self-efficacy are potential paths through which physical activity might reduce psychiatric symptoms (specifically depressive and anxiety symptoms) across the lifespan. Therefore, future interventional studies should consider incorporating these mechanisms to develop more effective interventions. There were insufficient studies to establish the role of other psychosocial, neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms across the lifespan.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Statements and Declarations
Funding
This work was supported by the Ramón Areces Foundation.
Competing interests
Phuong Thuy Nguyen Ho, Tram Ha Pham Bich, Thao Tong, Wichor M Bramer, Amy Hofman, David Revalds Lubans, Meike W. Vernooij, and María Rodriguez-Ayllon declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and material
Not applicable
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Code availability
Not applicable
Contributors
MR-A, PTNH, WMB, TPBH, TT designed and drafted the systematic review. WMB performed the search strategy. MR-A, PTNH, TPBH, TT, AH, DRL and MV revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. MR-A will be the guarantor of the review.
References
