Abstract
Background Early relational health is a key determinant of childhood development, while relational trauma in the parent-infant dyad can instigate a cascading pattern of infant risk. Fortunately, early relational trauma is detectable and modifiable. In 2018, Australian Maternal and Child Health (MCH) nurses participated in MERTIL (My Early Relational Trauma-Informed Learning), a program to identify and prevent relational trauma. Program evaluations revealed nurses felt competent and confident to identify and respond to relational trauma; however, response capacity was inhibited by inadequate parent referral options. In response, MERTIL for Parents (My Early Relational Trust-Informed Learning) was developed, which is an online, evidence-based, self-paced parenting program that focuses on enhancing parental knowledge of relational trust and its significance for infant development. This low-cost, accessible prevention resource targets emerging relational concerns to reduce later service system engagement. The potential for universal preventative online programs that target parental and relational wellbeing remains under-explored. This paper reports on a protocol for implementing a MERTIL for Parents pilot study describing nurses’ and parents’ perspectives on program feasibility and efficacy.
Methods This study is a mixed-methods, parallel-armed, uncontrolled, repeated measures design. We aim to recruit 48 Australian MCH nurses from the states of Victoria and New South Wales. These nurses will in turn recruit 480 parents with a child aged 0-5 years. All parents will receive MERTIL for Parents, which entails a 40-minute video, tipsheets, worksheets, and support resources. Parent data will be obtained at three periods: pre-program, program exit, and program follow-up. Nurse data will be collected at two periods: parent recruitment completion and program follow-up. Data collection will occur through surveys and focus groups. Primary parent outcomes will be socioemotional assessments of program efficacy. Nurses and parents will each report on study program feasibility.
Discussion This protocol describes the feasibility and efficacy of a new online parenting program, MERTIL for Parents, with pilot field studies commencing in August 2022. We anticipate that this resource will be a valuable addition to various child and family services, for use in individual support and group work.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
YES- JO, JM, and LH received funding from La Trobe University’s (www.latrobe.edu.au ) ABC Internal Investment Scheme. This grant did not have an associated grant number as it was an internal university grant.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at La Trobe University (HEC: 22096).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Leesa Hooker: l.hooker{at}latrobe.edu.au
Tanudja Gibson: t.gibson{at}latrobe.edu.au
Jennifer E McIntosh: jenn.mcintosh{at}latrobe.edu.au
Ethics approval: This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at La Trobe University (HEC: 22096).
Conflict of interest: No conflicts or competing interests to disclose.
Funding: JO, JM, and LH received funding from La Trobe University’s (www.latrobe.edu.au) ABC Internal Investment Scheme. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript
Note: This protocol was accepted and presented at the Family Relationship Services Australia (FRSA) conference in May 2022.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion by contacting the first author, JO.
