Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Co-designing an intervention to strengthen vaccine uptake in Congolese migrants in the UK (LISOLO MALAMU): a participatory study protocol

View ORCID ProfileAlison F Crawshaw, Caroline Hickey, Laura Muzinga Lutumba, Lusau Mimi Kitoko, Sarah Luti Nkembi, Felicity Knights, Yusuf Ciftci, Lucy P Goldsmith, Tushna Vandrevala, Alice S Forster, Sally Hargreaves
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.19.22277798
Alison F Crawshaw
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alison F Crawshaw
Caroline Hickey
3Hackney CVS, The Adiaha Antigha Centre, 24-30 Dalston Lane, London, E8 3AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Muzinga Lutumba
4Hackney Congolese Women Support Group, c/o Hackney CVS, The Adiaha Antigha Centre, 24-30 Dalston Lane, London, E8 3AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lusau Mimi Kitoko
4Hackney Congolese Women Support Group, c/o Hackney CVS, The Adiaha Antigha Centre, 24-30 Dalston Lane, London, E8 3AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Luti Nkembi
4Hackney Congolese Women Support Group, c/o Hackney CVS, The Adiaha Antigha Centre, 24-30 Dalston Lane, London, E8 3AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felicity Knights
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yusuf Ciftci
5Doctors of the World UK, London, E14 5AA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy P Goldsmith
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tushna Vandrevala
2Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George’s, University of London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alice S Forster
6Our Future Health, New Bailey, 4 Stanley Street, Manchester, M3 5JL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally Hargreaves
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: s.hargreaves{at}sgul.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Adult migrants are at risk of under-immunisation and are likely to need catch-up vaccination to bring them in line with the UK schedule. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted and exacerbated inequities in vaccine uptake, with migrants facing additional barriers to information, low vaccine confidence, and access to vaccine services. There is a need for participatory and theory-based research that meaningfully engages underserved migrant groups to make sense of their experiences and beliefs about vaccination and uses these insights to co-produce tailored interventions which can increase uptake. COVID-19 vaccination provides a unique entry-point and opportunity to explore these issues in tandem with addressing routine immunisation gaps and developing more culturally-sensitive routine vaccination services.

Methods and analysis LISOLO MALAMU (‘Good Talk’) is a community-based participatory research study which uses co-design, design thinking and behaviour change theory to engage adult Congolese migrants in developing a tailored intervention to increase vaccine uptake. A community-academic coalition will lead and co-design the study. The study will involve i) in-depth interviews with adult Congolese migrants (foreign-born, >18 years), ii-iii) interviews and consensus workshops with clinical, public health and community stakeholders, and iv) co-design workshops with adult Congolese migrants. Qualitative data will be analysed iteratively, using Thematic Analysis, and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework, with participation from the coalition in discussing and interpreting findings and selecting intervention functions to guide the co-design workshops. Sociodemographic data of interview participants will be summarised using descriptive statistics. The study will run from approximately November 2021-November 2022.

Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been granted by the St George’s University Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 2021.0128). Study findings will be widely disseminated by the coalition through local community organisations in Hackney and broader academic and policy stakeholders, including a final celebration event. Recommendations for a future larger scale study and testing of prototyped interventions will be made.

Strengths

  • This study will directly respond to ongoing calls for community-centred and participatory approaches to engaging migrants in routine and COVID-19 vaccination, by implementing a value-driven and reciprocal approach to conducting a study addressing the needs of an underserved community.

  • The target population was selected following a comprehensive systematic review of the evidence (1) and pre-engagement scoping work conducted with migrant community representatives in London, UK. (2, 3)

  • It aims to co-produce a tailored intervention to address specific barriers to, and strengthen, vaccine uptake for COVID-19 and routine vaccines in adult Congolese migrants (including MMR, Td/IPV, and HPV) as set out by UKHSA guidance (4), and has been co-designed with, and will be co-delivered by, a coalition formed of academic researchers, a council for voluntary service (a local charity which offers services and support for local voluntary and community organisations), and a Congolese community-based organisation.

Limitations

  • As this study is tailored to the Congolese migrant population, other migrants who also face barriers to vaccine uptake are not included. Whilst we can draw some conclusions about the experiences of other Black migrants who face similar historical and cultural barriers to uptake of routine and COVID-19 vaccines, our ability to generalise the findings to all migrant communities might be limited.

  • Co-designed intervention prototypes will not be formally implemented and evaluated in this study, however recommendations will be made so that this can be done in a future phase.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Advanced Fellowship 300072). SH and AFC are additionally funded by the Academy of Medical Sciences (SBF005 1111) and the World Health Organization. SH acknowledges funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation La Caixa Foundation (Mobility Global Medicine and Health Research grant). The funders did not have any direct role in the writing or decision to submit this manuscript for publication. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Ethics committee/IRB of St George's, University of London, gave ethical approval for this work (St George's University Research Ethics Committee, reference 2021.0128).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • acrawsha{at}sgul.ac.uk

  • caroline{at}hcvs.org.uk

  • hcwsg{at}outlook.com

  • hcwsg{at}outlook.com

  • hcwsg{at}outlook.com

  • fknights{at}sgul.ac.uk

  • yusufciftci4{at}gmail.com

  • lgoldsmi{at}sgul.ac.uk

  • t.vandrevala{at}sgul.kingston.ac.uk

  • alice.forman{at}ourfuturehealth.org.uk

Data Availability

The manuscript is a prospective study protocol and therefore does not contain data, however the data collected in future by the study will be available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 19, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Co-designing an intervention to strengthen vaccine uptake in Congolese migrants in the UK (LISOLO MALAMU): a participatory study protocol
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Co-designing an intervention to strengthen vaccine uptake in Congolese migrants in the UK (LISOLO MALAMU): a participatory study protocol
Alison F Crawshaw, Caroline Hickey, Laura Muzinga Lutumba, Lusau Mimi Kitoko, Sarah Luti Nkembi, Felicity Knights, Yusuf Ciftci, Lucy P Goldsmith, Tushna Vandrevala, Alice S Forster, Sally Hargreaves
medRxiv 2022.07.19.22277798; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.19.22277798
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Co-designing an intervention to strengthen vaccine uptake in Congolese migrants in the UK (LISOLO MALAMU): a participatory study protocol
Alison F Crawshaw, Caroline Hickey, Laura Muzinga Lutumba, Lusau Mimi Kitoko, Sarah Luti Nkembi, Felicity Knights, Yusuf Ciftci, Lucy P Goldsmith, Tushna Vandrevala, Alice S Forster, Sally Hargreaves
medRxiv 2022.07.19.22277798; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.19.22277798

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)