Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A randomized controlled trial on the effects of decision aids for choosing discharge destinations of older stroke patients

View ORCID ProfileYoriko Aoki, Kazuhiro Nakayama, View ORCID ProfileYuki Yonekura
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.28.22277637
Yoriko Aoki
1Department of Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yoriko Aoki
  • For correspondence: yoriko18{at}med.u-toyama.ac.jp
Kazuhiro Nakayama
2Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuki Yonekura
2Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yuki Yonekura
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In Japanese medical practice, older stroke survivors are bombarded with information regarding their discharge locations, increasing their decision-making difficulties. This study used a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the influence of using decision aids (DAs) matching the values of older stroke patients and their families on the internal conflict and participation in discharge destination decisions.

Participants were randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. The intervention lasted for two months, from admission to discharge, and a survey was conducted on both occasions. DAs were provided to the intervention group, and brochures to the control group. The decisional conflict scale (DCS) and the control preference scale (CPS) were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. An unpaired t-test and z-test analyzed inter-group differences in DCS, and CPS, respectively. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN Registration No.: UMIN00032623), certified as a test registration institution by the World Health Organization.

Ninety-nine participants completed a full analysis set, which revealed that the intervention group had significantly more participants who had already decided on their discharge destination while they were admitted to the hospital. These were “the same place as before admission” in a significant number of cases. No significant inter-group differences were found in the DCS and CPS scores. DAs were effective at reducing uncertainty and controlling the decline in participation rates, especially in participants living alone who were unable to decide their discharge destination, and at clarifying the values of those aged 75 and older. The DA made it possible to increase available choices and explain the disadvantages regarding various locations of discharge destinations, allowing fewer internal conflicts in the decision-making process. Going forward, there is a need to further our understanding of methods of offering DA, the ideal duration of these interventions, and the identification of beneficiaries.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

UMIN00032623 https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036967

Funding Statement

This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (Task number: 19K11244) in the design of the study collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and writing of the manuscript. However, The funders, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. o YA is awarded Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (Task number: 19K11244, https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/nrid/1000040533477/). KN is awarded Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (Task number: 20H03967) and Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Research (Exploratory) (Task number: 20K21729), https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/nrid/1000050222170/. YY is awarded Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (Task number: 22H03381, https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/nrid/1000050583845/). However, The funders, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Ethics Review Committee of St. Luke's International University (18-A010), Toyama University (30-60) and the children's Support Center of Toyama Prefecture Rehabilitation Hospital (No. 51).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data supporting the results reported in the article are available upon request from the principal investigator's affiliation, Dept. of Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama. Yoriko Aoki, +81-74-434-7420, yoriko18{at}med.u-toyama.ac.jp.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 03, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A randomized controlled trial on the effects of decision aids for choosing discharge destinations of older stroke patients
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A randomized controlled trial on the effects of decision aids for choosing discharge destinations of older stroke patients
Yoriko Aoki, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Yuki Yonekura
medRxiv 2022.07.28.22277637; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.28.22277637
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A randomized controlled trial on the effects of decision aids for choosing discharge destinations of older stroke patients
Yoriko Aoki, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Yuki Yonekura
medRxiv 2022.07.28.22277637; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.28.22277637

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Nursing
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)