Abstract
The DASS-21 has been studied in different samples and cultures as a brief tool for screening and referral to specialized interventions, thus presenting the prerogative to be characterized as a complex system (CS). CS is a new approach to data analysis assumes that items on a scale are components integrated as a network. Despite this, to date network analysis has not been applied to verify the psychometric properties of the DASS-21. This was a non-clinical sample consisting of college students and professionals (N = 4017), aged 18 years or older (M = 31.16; SD = 10.308), from different Brazilian regions. The data collection was done through electronic forms composed by a sociodemographic questionnaire and DASS-21. Participants could forward the form to other potential respondents. Uni, bi, and multivariate analyses were used, and, among them, exploratory graph analysis (EGA) and boostrap EGA (BootEGA). EGA e BootEGA generated a model with four factors. The four-factor model from DASS-21 showed better fit rates compared to the others replicated in this research. The new four factor model has excellent composite reliability and is invariant regard to gender and type of activity performed. This research was composed of a non-probabilistic and convenience sample, without equitable geographical distribution of the participants and whose answers to this study were provided only by the web-based forms. The DASS-21 presented a new factor model composed of four distinct dimensions with excellent intrinsic features.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
MLMT National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil. No. The funding agency has not been involved in the design of this study, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the results, writing of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was submitted and approved by the ethics and research involving human subjects committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, under the registration code CAAE 07077019.3.0000.5149, in accordance with resolutions 466/2012 and 510/2016 of the National Health Council (CNS).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
