Abstract
Systematic determination of rare and novel variant pathogenicity remains a major challenge, even when there is an established association between a gene and phenotype. Here we present Power Window (PW), a novel sliding window technique that identifies the clinically impactful regions of a gene using population-scale clinico-genomic datasets. By sizing windows based on the number of variant carriers, rather than the number of variants or nucleotides, statistical power is held constant during analysis, enabling the localization of clinical impact as well as the removal of unassociated gene regions. This method can be used to focus on: specific variant types such as loss of function (LoF) or other coding; parts of a gene, such as those expressed in different tissues; or isolating gene regions with opposite directions of effect. Using a training set of 300K exomes from the UKBiobank (UKB), we developed PW-based LoF and coding models for well-established gene-disease associations and tested their accuracy in two additional cohorts (128k exomes from the UKB and 30k exomes from the Healthy Nevada Project (HNP)). The significant PW models retained a mean of 64% of the rare variant carriers in each gene (range 16-98%), with quantitative traits showing a mean effect size improvement of 48% compared to aggregating rare variants across the entire gene, and the odds ratios for binary traits improving by a mean of 2.4-fold. PW showcases that EHR-based statistical analyses can accurately distinguish between novel coding variants that will have high phenotypic penetrance in a population and those that will not, unlocking new potential for population genetic screening.
Competing Interest Statement
KMSB, ETC, AB, WL, and NLW are all employees of Helix. A patent has been filed by Helix for the Power Window analysis technique with ETC, KMSB, and NLW as inventors, and its current status is unpublished (application number 17575894).
Funding Statement
Funding was provided to DRI by the Nevada Governor's Office of Economic Development. Funding was provided to the Renown Institute for Health Innovation by Renown Health and the Renown Health Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The HNP study was reviewed and approved by the University of Nevada, Reno Institutional Review Board (IRB, project 956068-12). The UKB study was approved by the North West Multicenter Research Ethics Committee, UK. All participants gave their informed, written consent prior to participation. All data used for research were deidentified.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Statistics relating to the Power Window analysis for all included genes, calculated using the UKB 300K discovery cohort, are available in Table S3. UKB data are available for download (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/) to qualified researchers. The HNP data are available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request and with permission of the Institute for Health Innovation (IHI) and Helix. Researchers who would like to obtain the raw genotype data related to this study will be presented with a data user agreement which requires that no participants will be re-identified and no data will be shared between individuals or uploaded onto public domains. The IHI encourages and collaborates with scientific researchers on an individual basis. Examples of restrictions that will be considered in requests to data access include but are not limited to (1) whether the request comes from an academic institution in good standing and will collaborate with our team to protect the privacy of the participants and the security of the data requested, (2) type and amount of data requested, (3) feasibility of the research suggested, (4) amount of resource allocation for the IHI and Renown Hospital required to support the collaboration. Any correspondence and data availability requests related to HNP should be addressed to JG at (Joe.Grzymski{at}dri.edu) or Craig Kugler (Craig.Kugler{at}dri.edu).
