Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Real-world uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among individuals expressing vaccine hesitancy: a registry-linkage study

View ORCID ProfileKristin L. Andrejko, Jennifer F. Myers, Nozomi Fukui, Lauren Nelson, Rui Zhao, View ORCID ProfileJohn Openshaw, James P. Watt, Seema Jain, Joseph A. Lewnard, View ORCID ProfileJake M. Pry the California COVID-19 Case-Control Study Team
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.02.22278300
Kristin L. Andrejko
1California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States
2Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kristin L. Andrejko
Jennifer F. Myers
1California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nozomi Fukui
1California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Nelson
1California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rui Zhao
1California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Openshaw
1California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John Openshaw
James P. Watt
1California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seema Jain
1California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph A. Lewnard
2Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States
3Division of Infectious Diseases & Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States
4Center for Computational Biology, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jake.pry{at}cdph.ca.gov jmpry{at}ucdavis.edu jlewnard{at}berkeley.edu
Jake M. Pry
1California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States
5Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, United States
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jake M. Pry
  • For correspondence: jake.pry{at}cdph.ca.gov jmpry{at}ucdavis.edu jlewnard{at}berkeley.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Uptake of COVID-19 vaccination remains suboptimal in the United States and other settings. Though early reports indicated that a strong majority of people were interested in receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, the association between vaccine intention and uptake is not yet fully understood.

Methods During 24 February-5 December 2021, we enrolled California residents receiving molecular tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection who had not yet received any COVID-19 vaccine doses. Unvaccinated participants provided information on their intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccination in a telephone-administered survey. We matched study participants with a state-wide immunization registry and fit a Cox proportional hazards model comparing time to vaccination among those unvaccinated at study enrollment by vaccination intention (willing, unsure, or unwilling).

Findings Among 864 participants who were unvaccinated at the time of interview, 272 (31%) had documentation of receipt of COVID-19 vaccination later; including 194/423 (45.9%) who had initially reported being willing to receive vaccination, 41/185 (22.2%) who reported being unsure about vaccination, and 37/278 (13.3%) who reported unwillingness to receive vaccination. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for registry-confirmed COVID-19 vaccination were 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.76) and 0.21 (0.12-0.36) for participants expressing uncertainty and unwillingness to receive vaccination, respectively, as compared with participants who reported being willing to receive vaccination. Time to vaccination was shorter among participants from higher-income households (aHR 3.30 [2.02-5.39]) and who reported co-morbidities or immunocompromising conditions (aHR 1.54 [1.01-2.36]); time to vaccination was longer among participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection (aHR 0.60 [0.43-0.84]). Sensitivity of self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status was 82% (80-85%) overall, and 98% (97-99%) among those referencing vaccination records; specificity was 87% (86-89%).

Interpretation Participants’ stated willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccination was an imperfect predictor of real-world vaccine receipt. Improving messaging about the importance of COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection status, may improve vaccine uptake among populations who express hesitancy to initiate vaccination.

Evidence before this study We searched PubMed and medRχiv for variations and combinations of the terms “vaccine hesitancy”, “vaccine confidence”, “vaccine uptake”, “COVID-19”, and “SARS-CoV-2” to identify original research articles published by March 8, 2022. The majority of screened articles were cross-sectional surveys conducted prior to or after implementation of COVID-19 vaccines to assess trends or predictors of participant-reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. While some studies included random population-based samples, many were conducted within subgroups like health care professionals, parents of school aged children, or college students. Evidence about the association between COVID-19 vaccine intentions and subsequent vaccine uptake remains scarce. Three observational studies quantified associations between willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccination and subsequent initiation of vaccination; however, in these studies, follow-up time was limited to the period prior to widespread availability of COVID-19 vaccination or initiation of vaccine mandates in workplaces, schools, and other public places. Therefore, it was unclear whether remaining unvaccinated at follow-up in these studies was a choice or a consequence of the lack of universal access to COVID-19 vaccines. Additionally, most efforts to identify subsequent vaccine uptake relied on self-reported vaccination status, which may be subject to reporting or interviewer bias. We also searched PubMed and medRχiv with variations and combinations of the terms “self-reported”, “vaccination”, “accuracy”, and “COVID-19” and did not discover any articles validating self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status against immunization registry data; whereas, such studies were available for other vaccine-preventable pathogens including influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and human papillomavirus.

Added value of this study We linked data collected through an ongoing case-control study and a comprehensive state-wide immunization registry to evaluate the association between COVID-19 vaccination intention and subsequent uptake. We also assessed the reliability of self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status by linking participant records with a state-wide immunization registry. We are not aware of another published study assessing predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake spanning over 7 months of age-eligible follow-up time and adjudicating the use of self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status. We found that expressing hesitancy to receive COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower adjusted hazards of subsequent vaccine uptake as compared with expressing willingness to receive vaccination (aHR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.32-0.76), although uptake was also suboptimal among individuals who expressed willingness (45%). Participants from lower income households or who had recently tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were slower to initiate vaccination than from higher income households or who had recently tested negative. People who were pregnant and initially deferred vaccination were faster to receive vaccination than participants who did not cite pregnancy as a reason for refusal. Upon assessing the accuracy of self-reported vaccination status, we found referencing a vaccination card or another calendar reference source improved sensitivity of self-reported vaccination status.

Implications of all available evidence We provide an evaluation of predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and assess the validity of self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status in comparison with a state-wide immunization registry. We identified that self-reported vaccination intent was a strong but imperfect predictor of subsequent vaccine initiation. However, no single reason for participants to express vaccine hesitancy predicted their likelihood of eventual vaccine receipt. As such, public health campaigns addressing multiple factors underlying vaccine hesitancy including those correcting sources of misinformation, and allaying concerns about short- or long-term side effects and vaccine safety remain important tools to improve acceptance in hesitant populations. Future studies reliant on the use of self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status should strive to utilize additional reference sources like COVID-19 vaccination cards or vaccination registries to reduce misclassification of vaccination status.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Work was possible through the support of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity (ELC) enhancement extension.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Study protocol was approved by the California Health and Human Services Agency - Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects project number: 2021-034.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵† JAL and JMP Jointly supervised study

  • ↵§ Members of the California COVID-19 Case-Control Study Team include: Yasmine Abdulrahim, Camilla M. Barbaduomo, Miriam I. Bermejo, Julia Cheunkarndee, Adrian F. Cornejo, Savannah Corredor, Najla Dabbagh, Natalie Dassian, Jennifer L. DeGuzman, Zheng N. Dong, Ashly Dyke, Anna T. Fang, Diana Nicole Morales Felipe, Paulina M. Frost, Timothy Ho, Mahsa H. Javadi, Amandeep Kaur, Amanda Lam, Monique Miller, Amanda Moe, Jessica Ni, Hyemin Park, Diana J. Poindexter, Helia Samani, Shrey Saretha, Maya Spencer, Michelle M. Spinosa, Vivian H. Tran, Nikolina Walas, Christine Wan, Erin Xavier, and Yang (Amy) Zhou

Data Availability

Aggregated data may be requested however, subject to approval of the California Health and Human Services Agency - Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 03, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Real-world uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among individuals expressing vaccine hesitancy: a registry-linkage study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Real-world uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among individuals expressing vaccine hesitancy: a registry-linkage study
Kristin L. Andrejko, Jennifer F. Myers, Nozomi Fukui, Lauren Nelson, Rui Zhao, John Openshaw, James P. Watt, Seema Jain, Joseph A. Lewnard, Jake M. Pry
medRxiv 2022.08.02.22278300; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.02.22278300
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Real-world uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among individuals expressing vaccine hesitancy: a registry-linkage study
Kristin L. Andrejko, Jennifer F. Myers, Nozomi Fukui, Lauren Nelson, Rui Zhao, John Openshaw, James P. Watt, Seema Jain, Joseph A. Lewnard, Jake M. Pry
medRxiv 2022.08.02.22278300; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.02.22278300

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)