ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the consistency of return to sport and occupation recommendations following EHI provided in published clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements, position statements, and practice alerts. A secondary aim was to evaluate the consistency of medical policies governing the return to duty following EHI between the branches of the United States Armed Forces and the agreement with published recommendations.
Methods Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were searched for clinical practice guidelines and position statements published at any time that guided return to activity in individuals with EHI. Methodological quality was assessed and the specific recommendations for clinical management were extracted. Consistency of recommendations was evaluated.
Agreement between published guidelines and the policies governing return to activity in military tactical athletes with heat injury were also evaluated.
Results Two professional societal guidelines provided recommendations pertaining to return to function following EHI. There was consistency between guidelines regarding recommendations that addressed abstinence from activity; medical follow-up; graded resumption of activity; and return to function. Pertaining to military policy, contemporary regulations published in recent years reflected the best evidence provided in the professional guidelines. The greatest incongruency was noted in older military policies.
Conclusions This systematic review highlights the need for consistent recommendation across all branches of the military when it comes to returning servicemembers to duty after EHI.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors are military service member or employees of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17, U.S.C. SS105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, U.S.C. SS101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person's official duties. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government. No external funding was received for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclaimer: The authors are military service member or employees of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17, U.S.C. §105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, U.S.C. §101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government.
Support: No external funding was received for this work.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
