ABSTRACT
Purpose The prevalence of mental health problems has rapidly increased over time. The extent to which this captures changes in self-reporting due to decreasing stigma is unclear. We explore this by comparing time trends in mental health and stigma-related indicators across English regions.
Methods We produced annual estimates of self-reported mental disorders (SRMDs) across waves of the Health Survey for England (2009-18, n = 78,226) and three stigma-related indicators (knowledge, attitudes, and intended behaviour) across waves of the Attitudes Towards Mental Illness survey (2009-19, n = 17,287). Differences in trends were tested across nine Government Office Regions using linear models, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, marital status, and social class.
Results In 2009, SRMDs did not vary by region (p = .916) whereas stigma-related indicators did (p < .001), with London having the highest level of stigma and the North East having lowest level of stigma. Between 2009 and 2018-19, SRMDs increased and stigma-related indicators improved at different rates across regions (SRMDs p = .024; stigma-related indicators p < .001). London reported the lowest increase in SRMDs (+0.3 percentage point per year) yet among the largest improvements in attitudes and intended behaviour across regions.
Conclusions Improvements in attitudes towards mental illness did not mirror changes in self-reported mental health problems across English regions over the past decade. The findings do not support the argument that changes in public stigma, at least when defined at this regional scale, have been driving the increase in self-reported mental health indicators in recent years.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
TG holds a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and was also funded by the Fonds de Recherche du Quebec Sante (FRQS) during the start of this project. AM is funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ES/W001454/1). The Time to Change evaluation was funded by the UK Government Department of Health and Social Care, Comic Relief, and Big Lottery Fund. CH was supported by these grants from 2008-21.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Health Survey for England (HSE) and Attitudes towards Mental Illness (AMI) survey waves have systematically been approved by UK Research Ethics Committees.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The HSE dataset used here is available on the UK Data Service platform. The AMI dataset used here is available upon reasonable request to the authors.
