Abstract
Background Despite the potential for telemedicine in public libraries to expand healthcare access to those living a long distance from care and in broadband poor areas, there are few collaborations between libraries and healthcare providers offering these programs.
Purpose To explore licensed independent providers’ perspectives (LIPs) on telemedicine in public libraries as a method of improving equitable access to care for populations lacking the ability to connect to a telemedicine video visit from home.
Methods We used a two-phase explanatory sequential mixed methods design with a quantitative strand followed by a qualitative strand to explore LIPs’ perspective on telemedicine in public libraries. Surveys were analyzed descriptively and to determine group differences. Survey respondents were recruited to participate in interviews, which were analyzed thematically using descriptive content analysis.
Findings Fifty LIPs responded to the survey, and 12 were interviewed. Respondents were overwhelmingly supportive of telemedicine in public libraires, describing how video visits could help multiple vulnerable populations connect to providers when travel was cost prohibitive. They emphasized how connecting at-risk populations to a video visit instead of a telephone call allowed for a more thorough and accurate assessment. While several LIPs were concerned with privacy, others considered a library to be more private than the home. Interviews revealed how chronic illness management may be the ideal visit type for public library-based telemedicine.
Conclusions Given the importance of expanding access sites for telemedicine, providers should consider partnering with libraries in their catchment areas where broadband access is sparse, and patients must travel long distances to care. Managing chronic illnesses using telemedicine in public libraries may be an important approach toward reducing health disparities in populations who live long distances from care and do not have home-based internet access.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Virginia Institutional Review Board for Social and Behavioral Sciences gave ethical approval of this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
