Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The Feasibility of a Smartphone-based Digital Therapeutics for Dysarthria after Stroke (DiDaS): Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Yuyoung Kim, Minjung Kim, Jinwoo Kim, View ORCID ProfileTae-Jin Song
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.22278857
Yuyoung Kim
1HCI Lab, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minjung Kim
1HCI Lab, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinwoo Kim
1HCI Lab, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
2HAII Corporation, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tae-Jin Song
3Department of Neurology, Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tae-Jin Song
  • For correspondence: knstar{at}ewha.ac.kr
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Dysarthria is a motor speech disorder occurring from neurological conditions such as stroke. It leads to serious problems in the intelligibility of patients’ speech, affecting their ability to communicate, quality of life, and emotional well-being. While digital therapeutic approaches for rehabilitation of dysarthria are increasing, clinical evidence of the effectiveness of digital therapeutics has been lacking. A mobile application, D-ST01, has the potential to enhance intensive and repetitive speech rehabilitation due to its high treatment accessibility and its incorporation of gamification, tailored feedback, and interactive functions.

Methods In our trial, 60 stroke patients with dysarthria within 30 days following the occurrence of stroke will be recruited. In a 1:1 ratio, participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (using D-ST01 for 60 minutes/day, five days/week along with usual stroke care) or the control group (usual stroke care only). This will be a single-blind study in which researchers will evaluate outcome measurements while masked to treatment allocation. After four weeks of treatment intervention, we will compare speech and psychological changes between the two groups.

Conclusions Our study will evaluate the feasibility of the speech treatment application D-ST01 for patients with post-stroke dysarthria. In addition, it will collect evidence for investigating the future efficacy of a large-scale randomized controlled trial.

Trial registration number ClinicalTrial.gov #NCT05146765

Introduction

Stroke is one major cause of worldwide mortality and morbidity [1]. Approximately 40% of stroke patients experience disability [2, 3], and more than 50% of acute stroke victims experience dysarthria [4]. Dysarthria is a neurological motor speech disorder caused by weak, slow, or damaged muscles in the speech-production subsystems [5]. Dysarthria can negatively affect speech intelligibility [5] and communication [6], leading to abnormalities in vocal quality, speed, strength, volume, tone, steadiness, or breath control [5]. Difficulty with communication due to dysarthria after stroke poses a considerable barrier to involvement in social activities and negatively affects the quality of life [7]. It can also lead to emotional difficulties [8], including depression and anxiety.

Intervention for dysarthria involves speech rehabilitation strategies tailored to individual needs and goals [9]. Once emergent medical situations have been settled and the patient is neurologically stabled, intensive speech treatment is prescribed. The evidence suggests that early, rigorous, and repetitive speech therapy can facilitate neurological recovery [10, 11]. However, treatment adherence may be negatively impacted by the patients due to the tediously repeating nature of current speech treatment [12]. Furthermore, since speech therapy involves a substantial amount of time and effort of speech-language pathologist, patients may face restrictions on therapeutic resources [13]. Currently, only about one-third of patients receive sufficient speech therapy. The frequency of therapy also varies from patient to patient [14]. In this context, the use of digital technologies in speech therapy is continuously expanding due to its potential benefits [15].

Digital therapeutics (DTx) is an “evidence-based intervention using high-quality software to prevent, manage, or treat a medical disorder or disease” [16]. There are several advantages to using DTx for self-rehabilitation of dysarthria. DTx can provide more intensive and extended self-administered speech therapy through a smartphone. Also, DTx can overcome the barriers of in-clinic care by providing personalized treatment remotely regardless of time and place. Gamified rehabilitation is an emerging therapeutic methodology that offers good motivation, feedback, and interactivity [17] and can provide repetitive and goal-oriented programs tailored to each patient’s capabilities [18]. Moreover, conversational technologies can facilitate repetitive tasks by providing objective and quantified performance feedback [19]. These features will encourage patients to actively engage in the management of their health by reducing boredom and poor compliance issues [20]. In addition, post-stroke dysarthria patients can have difficulty visiting outpatient clinics due to mobility problems, insufficient family support, and distance between homes and clinics. Therefore, DTx can expand access to treatment [21]. A mobile system incorporating intensive, repetitive, and functional task-oriented speech treatment that can be initiated even during the acute phase will be an alternative to conventional rehabilitation.

However, evidence of the effectiveness of these treatments, particularly DTx, for post-stroke dysarthria is limited due to a lack of sufficiently powered and controlled trials [22]. We hypothesize that stroke patients with dysarthria treated with a speech therapy application called D-ST01 for four weeks will show more improvement in dysarthria symptoms than those who do not receive treatment with the D-ST01 application. Thus, our goal is to develop and test the feasibility of smartphone-based speech therapy, D-ST01, for a stroke patient with dysarthria.

Methods

Study design

This is a single-blind, pilot randomized controlled trial with stroke patients with dysarthria allotted to the intervention or control group (Fig 1 and Fig 2). All participants will be recruited among stroke patients from a single stroke center (Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital) in South Korea. The trial will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [23]. We will thoroughly explain the purpose and the terms of the study to the participants and receive written informed consent. The study received ethics approval from the Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital Institutional Review Board on December 21, 2021 (Approval number: SEUMC 2021-12-011). The trial is registered with NCT05146765.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig 1. DiDAS pilot trial schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments.
Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig 2. CONSORT diagram representing participant flow in the study

Inclusion procedure

The stroke specialist neurologists will screen and enroll participants who meet the eligibility criteria. If a participant meets the eligibility criteria and agrees to participate, a patient information sheet will be delivered to the research coordinator to confirm the patient’s eligibility. The principal investigator will inform the study process to the participants, including the various treatment options available for their symptoms and the risks and benefits of the intervention. Then, the principal investigator will obtain consent from the participant following Research Ethics Committee guidance and Clinical Practice Standards. Table 1 presents this study’s eligibility criteria.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Randomization

Participants will be randomly allocated with a 1:1 ratio to receive treatment with the speech therapy application along with usual stroke care (the intervention group) or usual stroke care only (the control group). The randomization will be performed by the research officer (not involved in this study) of the clinical trial center of Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University. An Excel spreadsheet will be used to generate the random list. The randomization will be created using reasonably sized permuted blocks, and the block size will not be disclosed until the completion of the trial to ensure masking.

Blinding

Due to the interactive nature of rehabilitation, it is not possible to mask the intervention to patients and research investigators. Therefore, we will blind the separate outcome assessors, who will not be involved in the treatment procedures, to minimize bias. In order to maintain blindness, participants will also be advised not to disclose their assigned group to the outcome assessors.

Interventions

Patients allocated to the control group

will receive “usual stroke care” including medical treatment and routine rehabilitation therapy for four weeks. Clinicians and speech-language pathologists will provide usual stroke care based on conventional stroke therapy guidelines [24, 25] and patient needs. This care is expected to be set according to clinical needs as agreed between clinicians and patients and modified according to progress. Participants in this group will only receive usual stroke care and will not use the mobile application, D-ST01.

Participants in the intervention group

will use the speech therapy application, D-ST01, in addition to receiving usual stroke care (see S3). D-ST01 is a mobile application that delivers speech therapy to patients with post-stroke dysarthria, allowing them to rehabilitate independently. As repetitive and intensive training is crucial in speech therapy, the system features gamification, tailored feedback, and interactive functions designed to motivate patients to persist with constant speech training. Ten different types of speech exercises are provided in the program, with the goal of enhancing speech intelligibility. Participants will perform the speech exercises for one hour per day, five days per week, for four consecutive weeks. They may complete the speech exercises all at once or split them into several sessions. The application provides both written and verbal instructions for each exercise in order to support participants with no or little experience in using a mobile application. The research team will help participants to install the application and will provide a practice session at baseline to enhance participants’ understanding of and engagement with the intervention. Furthermore, participants will be encouraged to reach out to the research team if any issues arise regarding the use of the application.

Data collection

The primary outcome will be indicated by changes in repeated measured data concerning speech intelligibility between the intervention group and control group from baseline to 4-weeks post-intervention.

Speech intelligibility will be assessed by reading “Gaeul” [26], a text commonly used to evaluate speech disorders in Korea. For future analysis and confirmation, all speech evaluations will be recorded using a high-quality digital recorder (SONY ICD-UX560F). Then, three researchers will listen to the continuous speech of participants and calculate the average by evaluating their intelligibility with a score of 0 (normal) to 6 (unintelligible) [27].

Secondary outcome measures will be evaluated at baseline and after 4 weeks. These will include percentage of consonants correct [28, 29], oral mechanism test [30], oral-diadochokinesis [31], maximum phonation time [32] and phonation evaluation [30]. The experienced speech-language pathologists (with a minimum experience of 6 years), blinded to the participants’ allocation, will be asked to assess various aspects of participants’ speech.

The tertiary outcome will be indicated by changes in a stroke scale and psychological scales. The qualified researchers will evaluate the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [33]. In addition, we will evaluate patient-reported outcomes concerning depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) [34], anxiety (Generalized Anxiety disorder-7) [35], quality of life (Euro Quality of Life) [36], and self-efficacy (Modified Computer Self-Efficacy Scale) [37].

In the last phase of the study, the patients who used the application will complete a system usability scale questionnaire to uncover their experience with the smartphone-based speech therapy [38]. Details of the outcome measures are described in the S2 protocol file.

Analyses

Sample size

The purpose of this study protocol is to investigate the feasibility of digital speech therapy for post-stroke dysarthria, and the results will be used for future power analyses of a larger study. A power calculation was carried out by using G*power 3.0 given the following: 1) power of 80%, 2) a two-sided alpha of 0.05, 3) an estimated effect size of 0.8, and 4) a 1:1 intervention allocation. Thus, each group will need a sample size of 26 participants.

The effect size was calculated by referring to the results of the existing study. Moon and Won studied the effectiveness of smartphone-based speech exercises for 14 acute stroke patients [39]. As a result of calculating the power for the primary outcome with a significance level of 0.05 and 26 participants per group, the oral mechanism was 98%, and oral-diadochokinetic was 98%. Therefore, the use of a major primary outcome, oral mechanism [30], and oral-diadochokinetic [40, 41] for 52 participants are expected to be appropriate in this study. The power analysis is described in detail in S2 protocol file.

A total of 60 participants (30 in each group) will be recruited, considering 15% dropout rate.

Statistical methods

All analyses, including a descriptive analysis of demographic and outcome data, will be performed in SPSS (version 25; IBM New York).

An intention-to-treat analysis will be conducted in order to compare outcome measures. First, the Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to examine whether the distribution of continuous variables is normal. Depending on normality, a parametric test (which assumes normal distribution) or non-parametric equivalents (not satisfied with a normality distribution) will be performed. The general characteristics of the two groups will be analyzed with the independent t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test.

Next, paired comparison within the groups (pre- and post-intervention) will be analyzed using the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A repeated measures analysis of variance will be performed for each result, taking into account the within-subject factor time (Pre; Post) and the between-subject factor group (Intervention group; Control group). Moreover, a linear mixed model that controls for baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and the location of cerebral infarction as fixed effects will be performed. Statistical significance will be set at p< 0.05. The Last Observation Carried Forward method [42] will be performed to manage the missing data.

Monitoring

A data monitoring committee is not needed since there is no risk that mobile-based intervention content will adversely affect participants. Participants may withdraw consent at any time for any reason. Should participants withdraw, they can discontinue the trial without any consequences. Additionally, if a participant requires immediate medical attention, the researchers may withdraw them from the trial.

Discussion

Our protocol is for a randomized clinical trial of a digital therapeutic provided to stroke patients with dysarthria. Although intensive and repetitive speech therapy is recommended due to its apparent benefits, post-stroke dysarthria treatment remains under-researched [43, 44]. Insufficient methodological rigor, a paucity of studies, and a narrow scope of evaluated interventions limit the available evidence concerning dysarthria treatment [22, 45].

Several studies have adopted traditional speech interventions, including behavioral techniques, breathing, non-speech oro-motor exercises, Lee Silverman Voice Treatment, repetition training of sound, and progressive reading [46]. In a study by Mahler and Ramig [47], reading phrases and Lee Silverman Voice Treatment, which targets high phonatory effort to improve speech skills, were employed in the intervention. Four patients with dysarthria at nine months or more post-stroke received 16 one-hour sessions over four weeks and showed positive responses. Park et al.[48] verified the effect of speech therapy on patients at least six months post-onset of stroke. The intervention consisted of a 60-minute practice, four times per week, for four weeks (16 sessions). The treatment in this study focused on enhancing speech intelligibility with repetitive acoustic-phonetic adjustments.

As in previous studies, our intervention is based on traditional treatments that incorporate motor learning principles (rigorous repetitive training and feedback) [44] and neuroplasticity (repetition, motivation, and reward) [10]. In addition, the treatment duration of one hour, five times per week, for four weeks is consistent with previous behavioral interventions in post-stroke dysarthria [47-50]. However, our protocol differs in enrolling stroke patients from acute to subacute period. The prognosis of speech treatment in the first few months is important since the stroke onset could be critical to reducing recovery time [51]. Nonetheless, the evidence of post-stroke dysarthria in the acute phase is weak [52]. Therefore, the results of our protocol will prove whether the smartphone-based intervention used in this study can help stroke patients with dysarthria to improve their conditions in the acute to subacute period.

As traditional speech therapy continues to fall short of meeting the needs of dysarthric patients, the use of technology in speech rehabilitation has increased, providing new opportunities to overcome the limits of face-to-face treatments. As in all post-stroke rehabilitation, inadequate long-term adherence is a problem in speech therapy [53, 54]. Patients may exercise less frequently than suggested [55], struggle to achieve daily treatment goals [56], or even quit therapy entirely [54]. Digital therapeutics available in home settings are expected to promote high-intensity programs [8], which allow self-management of speech training, facilitate access to care, improve treatment engagement, and lower care costs [16, 57]. Despite the various advantages of technology-based speech therapy, evidence that such therapies are effective in patients with dysarthria is lacking. Our D-ST01 intervention is novel and innovative in that it is composed of several technical features to help with post-stroke dysarthria treatment. D-ST01 adopts gamification elements, responding to users’ speech in real-time and providing points for each task. Since adherence to rehabilitation in stroke patients remains an unmet need, the gamified intervention can make training more enjoyable. As a result, patients’ increased intrinsic motivation can lead to treatment engagement [58, 59]. Technology also enables accurate measurement of several parameters of user interactions and generates valuable feedback to improve the performance of goal-oriented tasks [60]. Participants in this study will receive real-time performance feedback for each exercise (e.g., “Speak louder!”), as well as summary feedback on a daily and weekly basis. The use of this personalized feedback structure is in line with previous findings [44, 61], which indicate that it reinforces positive behaviors and enhances performance. Therefore, the goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to identify the feasibility of a smartphone-based post-stroke dysarthria treatment that incorporates gamification, tailored feedback, and interactive functions.

This protocol has a few limitations. First, although this is a pilot trial, the sample size is small. Therefore, generalization may be limited. Second, participants do not receive face-to-face treatment during the intervention. Under these circumstances, patients’ motivation might decrease due to the lack of interpersonal interaction, resulting in a higher-than-expected dropout rate [54, 60]. To address this limitation, we will monitor user data periodically and manage participants through intermittent phone coaching and messaging in order to reduce the number of dropouts. Third, since our D-ST01 app runs only in Korean, the result of the study may not be applicable to stroke patients in other countries. In addition, the study has limited generalizability to the population of patients who are incapable of using or accessing smartphone technology. This issue is particularly prevalent in the elderly population, which is the main target of our study, given that people over 60 account for the majority of stroke cases [61]. However, the findings of this study will form a basis for understanding elderly stroke patients and developing future speech rehabilitation programs for the aging population. Despite these limitations, the findings from this study will inform decisions about effect size estimates and power analysis in future studies.

Dissemination

Our study protocol will convey key findings and implications to stakeholders related to digital therapeutics for post-stroke dysarthria. The results will be used as evidence for large-scale clinical trials in the future and will be submitted and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and global conferences.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because of confidentiality. Data are available from the Institutional Data Access or Ethics Committee of Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital (contact via knstar{at}ewha.ac.kr) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. SPIRT 2013 checklist.

(DOCX)

S2 Protocol.

(DOCX)

S3 TIDieR checklist.

(DOCX)

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Yuyoung Kim, Minjung Kim, Tae-Jin Song

Methodology: Yuyoung Kim, Minjung Kim, Tae-Jin Song

Writing – original draft: Yuyoung Kim, Minjung Kim

Writing – review & editing: Yuyoung Kim, Minjung Kim, Tae-Jin Song

Supervision: Yuyoung Kim, Minjung Kim, Tae-Jin Song, Jinwoo Kim

References

  1. 1.↵
    Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins S, Sacco RL, Hacke W, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. International Journal of Stroke. 2022;17(1):18–29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917. PubMed PMID: 34986727.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Hackett ML, Duncan JR, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Bonita R. Health-Related Quality of Life Among Long-Term Survivors of Stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(2):440–7. doi: doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.2.440.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Forbes S, Anderson CS. Long-term disability after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989-1990. Stroke. 2002;33(4):1034–40. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000012515.66889.24. PubMed PMID: 11935057.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Flowers HL, Silver FL, Fang J, Rochon E, Martino R. The incidence, co-occurrence, and predictors of dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia after first-ever acute ischemic stroke. Journal of communication disorders. 2013;46(3):238–48. Epub 20130412. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.04.001. PubMed PMID: 23642855.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. St. Louis, Missouri
    Duffy JR. Motor speech disorders : substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. Fourth edition. ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2020.
  6. 6.↵
    Pamela Comrie CMJM. The influence of acquired dysarthria on conversational turn-taking. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2001;15(5):383–98. doi: 10.1080/02699200110036380.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    Mackenzie C, Kelly S, Paton G, Brady M, Muir M. The Living with Dysarthria group for post-stroke dysarthria: the participant voice. International journal of language & communication disorders. 2013;48(4):402–20. Epub 20130417. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12017. PubMed PMID: 23889836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Dickson S, Barbour RS, Brady M, Clark AM, Paton G. Patients’ experiences of disruptions associated with post-stroke dysarthria. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 2008;43(2):135–53. doi: 10.1080/13682820701862228. PubMed PMID: 18283594.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Mitchell C, Bowen A, Tyson S, Conroy P. A feasibility randomized controlled trial of ReaDySpeech for people with dysarthria after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2018;32(8):1037–46. Epub 20171226. doi: 10.1177/0269215517748453. PubMed PMID: 29278019; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6088453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Kiran S, Thompson CK. Neuroplasticity of Language Networks in Aphasia: Advances, Updates, and Future Challenges. Frontiers in Neurology. 2019;10:295. Epub 20190402. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00295. PubMed PMID: 31001187; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6454116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Robertson SJ, Thomson F. Speech therapy in Parkinson’s disease: a study of the efficacy ad long term effects of intensive treatment. British Journal of Disorders of Communication. 1984;19(3):213–24. doi: 10.3109/13682828409029837. PubMed PMID: 6508992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Tamayo-Serrano P, Garbaya S, Bouakaz S, Blazevic P. A Game-Based Rehabilitation Therapy for Post-Stroke Patients: An Approach for Improving Patient Motivation and Engagement. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine. 2020;6(4):54–62. doi: 10.1109/MSMC.2020.3002519.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Avan A, Digaleh H, Di Napoli M, Stranges S, Behrouz R, Shojaeianbabaei G, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke incidence, prevalence, mortality, and worldwide burden: an ecological analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):191. Epub 20191024. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1397-3. PubMed PMID: 31647003; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6813111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Dobkin BH, Dorsch A. New evidence for therapies in stroke rehabilitation. Current atherosclerosis reports. 2013;15(6):1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11883-013-0331-y. PubMed PMID: 23591673; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3679365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Fairburn CG, Patel V. The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2017;88:19–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Abbadessa G, Brigo F, Clerico M, De Mercanti S, Trojsi F, Tedeschi G, et al. Digital therapeutics in neurology. Journal of Neurology. 2022;269(3):1209–24. Epub 20210520. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10608-4. PubMed PMID: 34018047; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8136262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Tăut D, Pintea S, Roovers J-PWR, Mañanas M-A, Băban A. Play seriously: Effectiveness of serious games and their features in motor rehabilitation. A meta-analysis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41:105–18. doi: 10.3233/NRE-171462.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    Fu MJ, Knutson JS, Chae J. Stroke Rehabilitation Using Virtual Environments. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics. 2015;26(4):747–57. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    Valentin LSS. Can Digital Games Be a Way of Improving the Neuroplasticity in Stroke Damage? Can the Adult Brain Grow New Cells or Rewire Itself in Response to a New Experience? Open Journal of Medical Psychology. 2017;6(2):153–65. doi: 10.4236/ojmp.2017.62013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Suchak P, Ameer K, Gaylard J, Newman J, Ali K. Improving patients experience in a neuro-rehabilitation unit using tablet computers. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare. 2016;4(2):289–95. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v4i2.1082.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Macoir J, Lavoie M, Routhier S, Bier N. Key Factors for the Success of Self-Administered Treatments of Poststroke Aphasia Using Technologies. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2019;25(8):663–70. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0116. PubMed PMID: 30142032.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Mitchell C, Bowen A, Tyson S, Butterfint Z, Conroy P. Interventions for dysarthria due to stroke and other adult-acquired, non-progressive brain injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;(1). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002088.pub3. PubMed PMID: CD002088.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. PubMed PMID: 24141714.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Ko SB, Park HK, Kim BM, Heo JH, Rha JH, Kwon SU, et al. 2019 Update of the Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Stroke for Endovascular Recanalization Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Journal of stroke. 2019;21(2):231–40. Epub 20190417. doi: 10.5853/jos.2019.00024. PubMed PMID: 30991800; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6549067.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, Cockroft KM, Gutierrez J, Lombardi-Hill D, et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021;52(7):e364–e467. Epub 20210524. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000375. PubMed PMID: 34024117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Kim HH, editor Perceptual, acoustical, and physiological tools in ataxic dysarthria management: a case report. Proceedings of the KSPS conference; 1996: The Korean Society Of Phonetic Sciences And Speech Technology.
  27. 27.↵
    Lousada M, Jesus LMT, Hall A, Joffe V. Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention with children with phonologically based speech–sound disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 2014;49(5):584–601. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12095.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    Kim YT, Park H, Kang JK, Kim JA, Shin MJ, Kim S-J, et al. Validity and reliability analyses for the development of Urimal Test of Articulation and Phonology-2. Communication Sciences & Disorders. 2018;23(4):959–70. doi: 10.12963/csd.18545.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    Namasivayam AK, Huynh A, Granata F, Law V, van Lieshout P. PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial. Pediatric Research. 2021;89(3):613–21. Epub 20200501. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0924-4. PubMed PMID: 32357364; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7979536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Shin MJ, Kim, J. O., Lee, S. B., & Lee, S. Y. Speech mechanism screening test. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2010.
  31. 31.↵
    Ziegler W. Task-related factors in oral motor control: speech and oral diadochokinesis in dysarthria and apraxia of speech. Brain and language. 2002;80(3):556–75. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2614. PubMed PMID: 11896657.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Kwon YG, Do KH, Park SJ, Chang MC, Chun MH. Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Dysarthria After Subacute Stroke. Annals of rehabilitation medicine,. 2015;39(5):793–9. Epub 20151026. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.5.793. PubMed PMID: 26605178; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4654087.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Oh MS, Yu K-H, Lee J-H, Jung S, Ko I-S, Shin J-H, et al. Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Journal of Clinical Neurology. 2012;8(3):177–83. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.3.177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999;282(18):1737–44. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737. PubMed PMID: 10568646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine. 2006;166(10):1092–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. PubMed PMID: 16717171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Lee Y-K, Nam H-S, Chuang L-H, Kim K-Y, Yang H-K, Kwon I-S, et al. South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value in health. 2009;12(8):1187–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00579.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly. 1995;19(2):189–211. doi: 10.2307/249688.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    Brooke JB, editor SUS: A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale 1996.
  39. 39.↵
    Moon j-H, Won Y-S. The Effects of Orofacial Exercises Program using Smart Phone on Swallowing Function and Tongue Strength in Acute Stroke Patients with Dysphagia. The Journal of the Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences. 2016;11(10):995–1002. doi: https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2016.11.10.995.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    Wang YT, Kent RD, Duffy JR, Thomas JE. Analysis of Diadochokinesis in Ataxic Dysarthria Using the Motor Speech Profile Program™. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2009;61(1):1–11. doi: 10.1159/000184539.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    Kent RD, Weismer G, Kent JF, Vorperian HK, Duffy JR. Acoustic studies of dysarthric speech: methods, progress, and potential. Journal of communication disorders. 1999;32(3):141–86. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9924(99)00004-0. PubMed PMID: 10382143.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    Hamer RM, Simpson PM. Last observation carried forward versus mixed models in the analysis of psychiatric clinical trials. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;166(6):639–41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040458. PubMed PMID: 19487398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Bislick LP, Weir PC, Spencer K, Kendall D, Yorkston KM. Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review. Aphasiology. 2012;26(5):709–28. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.676888.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    Maas E, Robin DA, Hula SNA, Freedman SE, Wulf G, Ballard KJ, et al. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2008;17(3):277–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Finch E, Rumbach AF, Park S. Speech pathology management of non-progressive dysarthria: a systematic review of the literature. Disability and rehabilitation. 2020;42(3):296–306. Epub 20181004. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1497714. PubMed PMID: 30286661.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Chiaramonte R, Pavone P, Vecchio M. Speech rehabilitation in dysarthria after stroke: a systematic review of the studies. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56(5):547–62. Epub 20200519. doi: 10.23736/s1973-9087.20.06185-7. PubMed PMID: 32434313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    Mahler LA, Ramig LO. Intensive treatment of dysarthria secondary to stroke. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2012;26(8):681–94. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.696173.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    Park S, Theodoros D, Finch E, Cardell E. Be Clear: A New Intensive Speech Treatment for Adults With Nonprogressive Dysarthria. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2016;25(1):97–110. doi: 10.1044/2015_ajslp-14-0113. PubMed PMID: 26882004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.
    Wenke RJ, Cornwell P, Theodoros DG. Changes to articulation following LSVT® and traditional dysarthria therapy in non-progressive dysarthria. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2010;12(3):203–20. doi: 10.3109/17549500903568468.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    Beijer LJ, Rietveld ACM, Ruiter MB, Geurts ACH. Preparing an E-learning-based Speech Therapy (EST) efficacy study: Identifying suitable outcome measures to detect within-subject changes of speech intelligibility in dysarthric speakers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2014;28(12):927–50. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.936627.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. 51.↵
    Coleman ER, Moudgal R, Lang K, Hyacinth HI, Awosika OO, Kissela BM, et al. Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review. Current atherosclerosis reports. 2017;19(12):1–12. Epub 20171107. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6. PubMed PMID: 29116473; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5802378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    Spencer KA, Brown KA, editors. Dysarthria following stroke. Seminars in speech and language; 2018: Thieme Medical Publishers.
  53. 53.↵
    Behrman A, Rutledge J, Hembree A, Sheridan S. Vocal hygiene education, voice production therapy, and the role of patient adherence: a treatment effectiveness study in women with phonotrauma. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2008;51(2):350–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/026).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    Hapner E, Portone-Maira C, Johns MM. A Study of Voice Therapy Dropout. Journal of Voice. 2009;23(3):337–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.10.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    van Leer E, Connor NP. Predicting and influencing voice therapy adherence using social– cognitive factors and mobile video. American journal of speech-language pathology. 2015;24(2):164–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-12-0123.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    van Leer E, Connor NP. Patient perceptions of voice therapy adherence. Journal of Voice. 2010;24(4):458–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    Kamoen O, Maqueda V, Yperzeele L, Pottel H, Cras P, Vanhooren G, et al. Stroke coach: a pilot study of a personal digital coaching program for patients after ischemic stroke. Acta Neurologica Belgica. 2020;120(1):91–7. Epub 20191107. doi: 10.1007/s13760-019-01218-z. PubMed PMID: 31701472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    Oyake K, Suzuki M, Otaka Y, Tanaka S. Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. Frontiers in neurology. 2020;11:553. Epub 20200610. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00553. PubMed PMID: 32587572; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7297944.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    Bakker M, Beijer L, Rietveld T. Considerations on Effective Feedback in Computerized Speech Training for Dysarthric Speakers. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2019;25(5):351–8. Epub 20180803. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0050. PubMed PMID: 30074851.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    Ramsberger G, Marie B. Self-administered cued naming therapy: A single-participant investigation of a computer-based therapy program replicated in four cases. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2007;16(4):343–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2007/038).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153–e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 17, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Feasibility of a Smartphone-based Digital Therapeutics for Dysarthria after Stroke (DiDaS): Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Feasibility of a Smartphone-based Digital Therapeutics for Dysarthria after Stroke (DiDaS): Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
Yuyoung Kim, Minjung Kim, Jinwoo Kim, Tae-Jin Song
medRxiv 2022.08.16.22278857; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.22278857
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The Feasibility of a Smartphone-based Digital Therapeutics for Dysarthria after Stroke (DiDaS): Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
Yuyoung Kim, Minjung Kim, Jinwoo Kim, Tae-Jin Song
medRxiv 2022.08.16.22278857; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.22278857

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)