Abstract
Maternal immune responses during pregnancy protect the growing fetus by clearing infection, preventing its vertical transmission, and through transplacental transfer of protective immune mediators to the fetus. How maternal immune response balances SARS-CoV-2 antiviral responses with transplacental transfer of protection to the fetus remains unclear. Our study shows that upon SARS-CoV-2 maternal infection, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are infrequently detected in cord blood. We uncovered that this is due to impaired IgG-NAbs placental transfer in symptomatic infection and to the predominance of maternal SARS-CoV-2 NAbs of the IgA and IgM isotypes, which are prevented from crossing the placenta. Crucially, the decision between favoring maternal antiviral response or transplacental transfer of immune protection to the fetus appears to hinge on the balance between IL-6 and IL-10 induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection, decreasing or increasing transplacental transfer of IgG-NAbs, respectively. In addition, IL-10 inversely correlates with maternal NK cell frequency. Finally, we found that ongoing infection favored perinatal transfer of maternal NK cells, highlighting a maternal sponsored mechanism to protect the newborn from horizontal transmission of infection. Our data point to an evolutionary trade-off which at once optimizes maternal viral clearance and vertical transfer of immune protection during the more susceptible perinatal period.
Brief Summary In SARS-CoV-2 maternal infection, the balance between maternal antiviral response and transplacental transfer of cellular and humoral (NAb) protection hinges on maternal IL-6 and IL-10.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and by Gilead Genese (PGG/009/2017) grants to H.S., RESEARCH4COVID 19 (Ref 580) to M.J.A. M.J.A., H.S. and J.G are supported by FCT through work contracts CEECIND/02373/2020, CEECIND/01049/2020 and PTDC/MEC-REU/29520/2017, respectively.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All participants provided informed consent and all procedures were approved by the ethics committees of Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central (859/2020) and of NOVA Medical School (112/2021/CEFCM), in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
