ABSTRACT
Identifying risk factors for musculoskeletal (MSK) injury is critical to maintain the health and safety of athletes. While current tests consider isolated assessments of function or subjective ratings, objective tests of reactive postural responses, especially when in cognitively demanding scenarios, may better identify risk of MSK injury than traditional tests alone.
Objectives To examine if objective assessments of reactive postural responses, quantified using wearable inertial measurement units, are associated with the risk for acute lower extremity MSK injuries in collegiate athletes.
Design Prospective survival analysis
Methods 191 Division I NCAA athletes completed an instrumented version of a modified Push and Release (I-mP&R) test at the beginning of their competitive season. The I-mP&R was performed with eyes closed under single- and dual-task (concurrent cognitive task) conditions. Inertial measurement units recorded acceleration and angular velocity data that was used to calculate time to stability (TTS). Acute lower extremity MSK injuries were tracked from first team activity for six months. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine if longer times to stability were associated with faster time to injury.
Results Longer TTS was associated with increased risk of injury; every 250 ms increase in dual-task median TTS was associated with a 37% increased risk of acute, lower-extremity MSK injury.
Conclusion Tests of reactive balance, particularly under dual-task conditions, may be able to identify athletes at risk of acute lower extremity MSK injury. Clinically-feasible, instrumented tests of reactive should be considered in assessments for prediction and prevention of MSK injury in collegiate athletes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was supported by from the Pac-12 Conference Student-Athlete Health and Well-Being Initiative (PI: Fino, Dibble). Additional funding support was provided by the Eunice Kennedy Shiver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K12HD073945 and the University of Utah Study Design and Biostatistics Center with funding, in part, from the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant UL1TR002538 (formerly 5UL1TR001067-05, 8UL1TR000105, and UL1RR025764). The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Pac-12 Conference, or its members, or of the National Institute of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Utah (Date: 2/28/2019/No: IRB_00116431)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
