How algorithms make the workplace -- A qualitative analysis of Chinese couriers

Introduction The use of managerial algorithms is rapidly changing how work is organized and managed globally. Courier work is one of the most affected occupations due to the common use of digital labour platforms (e.g. Meituan, Deliveroo and Uber). Existing research about algorithmic management (AM) has predominantly focused on its functionalities and failed to capture the underlying mechanism of AM as a potential source of work stress. This study aimed to fill the gap and explore how AM change Chinese couriers’ work experience.

Method We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with couriers in May-June 2021 in China. Thematic analysis was completed using Nvivo 12.

Results Couriers’ responses to AM and its effects varied as some felt motivated while others frustrated. AM can introduce new work stressors and interact with existing factors to alleviate or intensify work stress. Key themes emerged from the interviews included ‘App the “boss”‘, ‘Unequal exposure to AM and the role of human support’, ‘New work stressors of AM – Dehumanization and Datafication’, ‘Job stressors intensified by AM’ and ‘Varying individual response to AM’. App ‘the boss’ described how the couriers felt when managed by algorithms with learning and decision making capabilities. Employed, gig and agency couriers had different exposure to AM and human support of different quality, e.g. managers and customer service hotline. Dehumanization characterizes how algorithmic systems fulfil managerial functions in ways that differ from managers qualitatively or quantitatively. Datafication refers to the conversion of real-world information and user behaviour into data and being input in the system. Couriers also reported that the use of digital methods could intensify some work stressors. For example, time pressure was heightened among platform-based couriers with ‘late delivery’ as the most quoted concern. Customer rating and tracking also allowed customers to exert pressure on delivery time or service quality, and hence intensify their work stress. On the other hand, some couriers reported that AM can provide new job resources and can have benefits such as flexible hours, access to job opportunities, pay transparency, and bypassing office politics. Although this was a small sample but it appeared to us that younger participants had more positive experiences.

Conclusion This paper identified key work stressors of AM and explored how AM interacts with existing work stressors to shape Chinese couriers’ work experience. Couriers described how Dehumanization reduced the quality of support and their sense of relatedness to the workplace. Datafication or extraction of data from workers and lack of transparency led to concerns about potential discrimination, workplace unfairness and power imbalance. Couriers’ responses to AM varied and future research should take such heterogeneity into account.