Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma versus standard care in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from the Peruvian Social Security Health System: open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Cristian Villanueva, Ibeth Neyra, Arturo Sagastegui, Ausberto Chunga, Martin Oyanguren, View ORCID ProfileMartina Guillermo-Roman, Suly Soto-Ordoñez, Jorge L. Maguiña, Yamilee Hurtado-Roca, Percy Soto-Becerra, View ORCID ProfileRoger V. Araujo-Castillo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22280195
Cristian Villanueva
1Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ibeth Neyra
1Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arturo Sagastegui
1Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ausberto Chunga
1Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Oyanguren
1Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martina Guillermo-Roman
2Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martina Guillermo-Roman
Suly Soto-Ordoñez
2Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jorge L. Maguiña
2Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yamilee Hurtado-Roca
2Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Percy Soto-Becerra
2Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger V. Araujo-Castillo
2Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación – IETSI, EsSalud, Lima, Perú
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roger V. Araujo-Castillo
  • For correspondence: araujocaroger{at}gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma plus standard of care (CP + SoC) compared with standard of care (SoC) alone in patients hospitalized for moderate to severe COVID-19 who do not yet require mechanical ventilation.

METHODS Phase 2 randomized, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, controlled, superiority, single-center clinical trial. This clinical trial has been registered in REPEC with the following ID: 013-20. Hospitalized adult patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 were enrolled. The allocation ratio was 1:1 in a variable-size permuted block randomization scheme. The primary outcome was death 28 days after the intervention. Secondary outcomes were mortality at 14 and 56 days, time to death at 56 days, time in the ICU at 28 days, time on a mechanical ventilator at 28 days, frequency of adverse events, and frequency of serious adverse events.

RESULTS A total of 64 participants were enrolled, 32 were assigned to CP + SoC, and 32 to SoC. One participant assigned to CP + SoC withdrew his informed consent before applying the treatment. At day 28, there were no statistically significant differences for the primary outcome between the CP + SoC and SoC groups (relative risk: 2.06; 95%CI 0.73 to 7.11; p = 0.190). No differences were found in the incidences of mortality at 56 days (hazard ratio: 2.21; 95%CI 0.66 to 7.33; p = 0.182), admission to the ICU at 28 days (sub-hazard ratio: 2.06; 95%CI 0.57 to 8.55; p = 0.250), admission to mechanical ventilation at 28 days (sub-hazard ratio: 2.19; 95%CI 0.57 to 8.51; p = 0.260). Estimates for days 14 were similar. No infusion-related adverse events were reported during the study. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of any adverse events (odds ratio: 2.74; 95%CI 0.90 to 9.10; p = 0.085) or the frequency of serious adverse events (odds ratio: 3.60; 95%CI 0.75 to 26.1; p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS No evidence was found that CP had a significant effect in reducing 28-day mortality. There was also no evidence that the frequency of adverse events was higher in those who received CP + SoC than those who received only SoC.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This clinical trial has been registered in the Peruvian Registry of Clinical Trials (REPEC, by Spanish acronym) with the following ID: PER-013-20.

Funding Statement

This clinical trial has been co-financed by two institutions of the Government of Peru, the Institute for the Evaluation of Technologies in Health and Research - IETSI of the Social Security of Health (EsSalud) and the National Council of Science, Technology and Technological Innovation (CONCYTEC) through peer-reviewed external financing: the National Fund for Scientific Research, Technological Development and Technological Innovation (FONDECYT), subsidy (Nº 068-2020-FONDECYT). This grant was awarded to CV, IN, AS, AC, MO, JLM, YH, PSB and RA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the Transitory National Research Ethics Committee (CNTEI) -COVID-19 through Certificate of Approval - CNTEI-007-2020 dated June 19, 2020. The study is registered in the Peruvian Registry of Clinical Trials (REPEC) with code PER-013-20 (23) and was approved by the National Institute of Health through Directorial Resolution 198-2020-OGITT-INS dated June 25, 2020.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Financing This clinical trial has been co-financed by two institutions of the Government of Peru, the Institute for the Evaluation of Technologies in Health and Research - IETSI of the Social Security of Health (EsSalud) and the National Council of Science, Technology and Technological Innovation (CONCYTEC) through peer-reviewed external financing: the National Fund for Scientific Research, Technological Development and Technological Innovation (FONDECYT), subsidy (Nº 068-2020-FONDECYT). This grant was awarded to CV, IN, AS, AC, MO, JLM, YH, PSB and RA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

  • Conflicts of interest The authors declare not to have any interest conflicts.

  • Data availability The raw data was generated at the Institute for the Evaluation of Technologies in Health and Research - IETSI of Peru’s Social Security of Health (EsSalud). Restrictions apply to the public availability of these data due to institutional patient data sharing policies. However, the data is available upon reasonable request from the author.

  • Clinical Trial Registration Number: This clinical trial has been registered in the Peruvian Registry of Clinical Trials (REPEC, by Spanish acronym) with the following ID: PER-013-20.

Data Availability

The raw data was generated at the Institute for the Evaluation of Technologies in Health and Research - IETSI of Peru's Social Security of Health (EsSalud). Restrictions apply to the public availability of these data due to institutional patient data sharing policies. However, the data is available upon reasonable request from the author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 23, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma versus standard care in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from the Peruvian Social Security Health System: open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma versus standard care in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from the Peruvian Social Security Health System: open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial
Cristian Villanueva, Ibeth Neyra, Arturo Sagastegui, Ausberto Chunga, Martin Oyanguren, Martina Guillermo-Roman, Suly Soto-Ordoñez, Jorge L. Maguiña, Yamilee Hurtado-Roca, Percy Soto-Becerra, Roger V. Araujo-Castillo
medRxiv 2022.09.21.22280195; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22280195
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma versus standard care in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from the Peruvian Social Security Health System: open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial
Cristian Villanueva, Ibeth Neyra, Arturo Sagastegui, Ausberto Chunga, Martin Oyanguren, Martina Guillermo-Roman, Suly Soto-Ordoñez, Jorge L. Maguiña, Yamilee Hurtado-Roca, Percy Soto-Becerra, Roger V. Araujo-Castillo
medRxiv 2022.09.21.22280195; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22280195

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)