Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is an actual social issue which poses a challenge in terms of prevention, legal action, and reporting the abuse once it has occurred. In this last case, out of the total of female victims that fill a complaint against their abuser and initiate the legal proceedings, a significant number withdraw from it for different reasons. In this field, it is interesting to detect the victims that disengage from the legal process so that professionals can intervene before it occurs. Previous studies have applied statistical models to use input variables and make a prediction of withdrawal. However, it has not been found in the literature any study that uses machine learning models to predict disengagement from the legal proceedings in IPV cases, which can be a better option to detect these events with a higher precision. Therefore, in this work, a novel application of machine learning techniques to predict the decision of victims of IPV to withdraw from prosecution is studied. For this purpose, three different ML algorithms have been optimized and tested with the original dataset to prove the great performance of ML models against non-linear input data. Once the best models have been obtained, explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) techniques have been applied to search for the most informative input features and reduce the original dataset to the most important variables. Finally, these results have been compared to those obtained in the previous work that used statistical techniques, and the set of most informative parameters has been combined with the variables of the previous study, showing that ML-based models have a better predictive accuracy in all cases and that by adding one new variable to the previous work’ subset, the accuracy to detect withdrawal improves by 7.5%.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This work is based on a previous work (where the data collection process was designed and described and approved by the ethics committee), an ethics study is not necessary in this case as the data used was collected before and it is completely anonymised.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly in this work because of being collected and shared in a previous work.
