Abstract
Diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is challenging, as the symptoms are diverse and nonspecific. Electrophysiological studies have discovered several promising indicators of mTBI that could serve as objective markers of brain injury, but we are still lacking a diagnostic tool that could translate these findings into a real clinical application.
Here, we used a multivariate machine-learning approach to detect mTBI from resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements. To address the heterogeneity of the condition, we employed a normative modeling approach and modeled MEG signal features of individual mTBI patients as deviations with respect to the normal variation. To this end, a normative dataset comprising 621 healthy participants was used to determine the variation in power spectra across the cortex. In addition, we constructed normative datasets based on age-matched subsets of the full normative data. To discriminate patients from healthy control subjects, we trained support vector machine classifiers on the quantitative deviation maps for 25 mTBI patients and 20 controls not included in the normative dataset.
The best performing classifier made use of the full normative data across the entire age range. This classifier was able to distinguish patients from controls with an accuracy of 79%, which is high enough to substantially contribute to clinical decision making. Inspection of the trained model revealed that low-frequency activity in the theta frequency band (4–8 Hz) is a significant indicator of mTBI, consistent with earlier studies. The method holds promise to advance diagnosis of mTBI and identify patients for treatment and rehabilitation.
Significance statement Mild traumatic brain injury is extremely common, but no definite diagnostic method is yet available. Objective markers for detecting brain injury are needed to direct care to those who would best benefit from it. We present a new approach based on MEG recordings that first explicitly addresses the variability in brain dynamics within the population through normative modeling, and then applies supervised machine-learning to detect pathological deviations related to mTBI. The approach can easily be adapted to other brain disorders as well and could thus provide a basis for an automated tool for analysis of MEG/EEG towards disease-specific biomarkers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by European Research Council grant #658578 to LP, Neurocenter Finland (Functional Brain Imaging Biobank pilot project) and European Commission Regional Development Fund REACT-EU (#309487). Support was awarded to ML by the Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland, the Finnish Cultural Foundation, and the Sohlberg Foundation. HK was supported by The Finnish Medical Foundation, Paulo Foundation, and Helsinki University Hospital Research Fund. None of the funding sources had a role in conducting the research.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Data Availability
The data that supports the findings of the study are available upon reasonable request from the authors.
