ABSTRACT
Introduction There remains uncertainty around the impact of war on the lifespan of First World War (WW1) veterans.
Methods We obtained lifespan data on a random sample of 857 war-exposed New Zealand WW1 veterans and compared this with lifespans of a non-war military cohort (n=1039). This comparison was possible as the non-war-cohort arrived in Europe too late to participate in the war, allowing a “natural experiment” that avoided the “healthy solider effect”.
Results The lifespan comparisons indicated lower mean lifespan in the war-exposed veteran cohort compared to the non-war veteran cohort (69.7 vs 71.1 years; p=0.0405). This gap persisted (range: 0.8 to 1.1 years) but was no longer statistically significant when only considering the non-Māori ethnic grouping (nearly all European/Pākehā personnel), when excluding additional deaths in the immediate post-war period up to 31 December 1923, and when excluding participation in any other wars. Within the war-exposed cohort there were suggestive patterns of increasing lifespan with increasing occupational status and military rank (eg, 69.5, 70.0 and 70.7 mean years as group-level occupational status progressively increased). There were also stark differences in lifespan of 8.3 years between Māori (Indigenous) and non-Māori veterans (p=0.0083).
Conclusions The pattern of reduced lifespan in war-exposed vs non-war-exposed veterans, was compatible with a smaller previous New Zealand study. There are a number of feasible avenues to further improve this type of work with existing data sources.
Key messages
➢ There is still uncertainty around the impact of the First World War on premature death and lifespan in veterans internationally.
➢ This study of New Zealand veterans found lower mean lifespan in the war-exposed cohort compared to the non-war cohort (69.7 vs 71.1 years). This gap persisted, but was no longer statistically significant, when considering such factors as ethnicity of personnel and participation in any other wars.
➢ The pattern of reduced lifespan in war-exposed veterans was compatible with a smaller previous New Zealand study.
➢ There are a number of feasible avenues to further improve this type of work with existing data sources.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Massey University research funding was provided to one co-author (CC).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was provided through the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee process (Category B Approval, D22/030).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
