Abstract
Background Special populations like people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) and people with opioid use disorder (OUD) smoke tobacco cigarettes at rates three to four times greater than the general population. Patients with tobacco use disorder exhibit attentional bias (AB) for cigarette cues, which is theorized to be caused by classical conditioning and motivational salience. Eye tracking can quantify this bias by measuring fixation time (FT) on cigarette and matched neutral cues, which consequently helps calculate an AB score. Although previous studies have measured this bias in people who smoke without any other comorbid conditions, no study has measured this bias in special populations.
Methods We analyzed eye tracking data collected from participants in two randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The study protocols that recruited participants were approved by Medical Institutional Review Board (IRB) at University of Kentucky and were registered on clinical trials.gov (NCT05049460, NCT05295953). We compared FT and AB score towards cigarette cues between PLWHA and people with OUD who smoke, using a visual probe task and Tobii Pro Fusion eye tracker. We used two cigarette cue types, one encompassing people smoking cigarettes and the other consisting of cigarette paraphernalia. We used two cue presentation times, 1000 and 2000 milliseconds (ms).
Results Cues of people smoking cigarettes elicited greater AB than cues of cigarette paraphernalia across both subject groups when cues were presented for 2000 ms, but not 1000 ms. PLWHA who smoke exhibited greater AB for cues of people smoking cigarettes than cigarette paraphernalia when presented for 2000 ms compared to people with OUD who smoke.
Conclusion The addition of social cues potentiates cigarette cue AB, based on cue type and stimulus presentation time. Understanding the neurobiology of this relationship can help design treatments that can target AB and prevent relapse.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT05049460, NCT05295953
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers CA225419, DA035200) and University of Kentucky College of Medicine.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Medical Institutional Review Board (IRB) at University of Kentucky gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Our study data is available on Mendeley. The DOI is http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/g6yzzr34sx.1
