ABSTRACT
Background Several definitions exist for multimorbidity, frailty or polypharmacy, but no formal definition exists for “complex health needs”. We aimed to identify and characterise older people with complex health needs based on healthcare resource use (unplanned hospitalisations or polypharmacy) or frailty.
Methods In this cohort study, data was extracted from UK primary care records (CPRD GOLD), with linked Hospital Episode Statistics inpatient data. People aged >65 on 1st January 2010, registered in CPRD for ≥1 year were included. We identified complex health needs as the top quintile of unplanned hospitalisations, number of prescribed medicines, and electronic frailty index. We characterised all three cohorts, and quantified point-prevalence and incidence rates of preventative medicines use.
Results Overall, 90597, 110225 and 116076 individuals were included in the hospitalisation, frailty, and polypharmacy cohorts respectively. Frailty and polypharmacy cohorts had the highest bi- directional overlap. Most comorbidities such as diabetes and chronic kidney disease were more common in the frailty and polypharmacy cohorts compared to the hospitalisation cohort. Generally, prevalence of preventative medicines use was highest in the polypharmacy cohort compared to the other two cohorts: For instance, one-year point-prevalence of statins was 64.2% in the polypharmacy cohort vs. 60.5% in the frailty cohort.
Conclusions Three distinct groups of older people with complex health needs were identified. Compared to the hospitalisation cohort, frailty and polypharmacy cohorts had more comorbidities and higher preventative therapies use. Research is needed into the benefit-risk of different definitions of complex health needs and use of preventative therapies in the older population.
Competing Interest Statement
Professor D. Prieto-Alhambra receives funding from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) in the form of a senior research fellowship and from the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. His research group has received funding from the European Medicines Agency and Innovative Medicines Initiative. His research group has received research grant/s from Amgen, Chiesi-Taylor, GSK, Novartis, and UCB Biopharma. His department has also received advisory or consultancy fees from Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Johnson and Johnson, and UCB Biopharma; and speaker fees from Amgen and UCB Biopharma. Janssen and Synapse Management Partners have supported training programmes organised by DPA's department and open for external participants organized by his department outside the submitted work. Dr Victoria Strauss reports receiving grant support from NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) and Amgen, and receiving advisory or speaker payment from Astellas Pharma. Others have nothing to disclose.
Funding Statement
The research was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). Professor D. Prieto-Alhambra is funded through a NIHR Senior Research Fellowship (Grant number SRF-2018-11-ST2-004). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health and Care Research or the Department of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (ISAC) of UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency database research gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Leena.elhussein{at}ndorms.ox.ac.uk; helenhy{at}connect.hku.hk; antonella.delmestri{at}ndorms.ox.ac.uk; danielle.robinson{at}ndorms.ox.ac.uk; Victoria.strauss{at}csm.ox.ac.uk; Daniel.prietoalhambra{at}ndorms.ox.ac.uk
Data Availability
The data used in this article were obtained from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) under the Oxford University CPRD multi-study license. This data cannot be shared publically for ethical reasons.