Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques

Nahida Akter, Jack Gordon, Sherry Li, Mikki Poon, Stuart Perry, John Fletcher, Thomas Chan, Andrew White, Maitreyee Roy
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.03.22280629
Nahida Akter
1School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Gordon
1School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sherry Li
1School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mikki Poon
1School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart Perry
2School of Electrical and Data Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Fletcher
3School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Chan
4Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
6PersonalEYES, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew White
4Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
5Department of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
6PersonalEYES, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maitreyee Roy
1School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maitreyee.roy{at}unsw.edu.au
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose In this study, we investigated the performance of deep learning (DL) models to differentiate between normal and glaucomatous visual fields (VFs) and classify glaucoma from early to the advanced stage to observe if the DL model can stage glaucoma as Mills criteria using only the pattern deviation (PD) plots. The DL model results were compared with a machine learning (ML) classifier trained on conventional VF parameters.

Methods A total of 265 PD plots and 265 numerical datasets of Humphrey 24-2 VF images were collected from 119 normal and 146 glaucomatous eyes to train the DL models to classify the images into four groups: normal, early glaucoma, moderate glaucoma, and advanced glaucoma. The two popular pre-trained DL models: ResNet18 and VGG16, were used to train the PD images using five-fold cross-validation (CV) and observed the performance using balanced, pre-augmented data (n= 476 images), imbalanced original data (n=265) and feature extraction. The trained images were further investigated using the Grad-CAM visualization technique. Moreover, four ML models were trained from the global indices: mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD) and visual field index (VFI), using five-fold CV to compare the classification performance with the DL model’s result.

Results The DL model, ResNet18 trained from balanced, pre-augmented PD images, achieved high accuracy in classifying the groups with an overall F1-score: 96.8%, precision: 97.0%, recall: 96.9%, and specificity: 99.0%. The highest F1 score was 87.8% for ResNet18 with the original dataset and 88.7% for VGG16 with feature extraction. The DL models successfully localized the affected VF loss in PD plots. Among the ML models, the random forest (RF) classifier performed best with an F1 score of 96%.

Conclusion The DL model trained from PD plots was promising in differentiating normal and glaucomatous groups and performed similarly to conventional global indices. Hence, the evidence-based DL model trained from PD images demonstrated that the DL model could stage glaucoma using only PD plots like Mills criteria. This automated DL model will assist clinicians in precision glaucoma detection and progression management during extensive glaucoma screening.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee of the University of New South Wales, Sydney gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 04, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques
Nahida Akter, Jack Gordon, Sherry Li, Mikki Poon, Stuart Perry, John Fletcher, Thomas Chan, Andrew White, Maitreyee Roy
medRxiv 2022.10.03.22280629; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.03.22280629
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques
Nahida Akter, Jack Gordon, Sherry Li, Mikki Poon, Stuart Perry, John Fletcher, Thomas Chan, Andrew White, Maitreyee Roy
medRxiv 2022.10.03.22280629; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.03.22280629

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ophthalmology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)