Abstract
Clinical registry data contains a wealth of information on patients, clinical practice, outcomes and interventions. Machine learning algorithms are able to learn complex patterns from data. We present methods for using machine learning with clinical registry data to carry out retrospective audit of clinical practice. Using a registry of stroke patients, we demonstrate how machine learning can be used to: investigate whether patients would have been treated differently had they attended a different hospital; group hospitals according to clinical decision making practice; identify where there is variation in decision making between hospitals; characterise patients that hospitals find it hard to agree on how to treat. Our methods should be applicable to any clinical registry and any machine learning algorithm to investigate the extent to which clinical practice is standardized and identify areas for improvement at a hospital level.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula and by the National Institute for Health Research Health and Social Care Delivery Research (HSDR) Programme [HS&DR 17/99/89]
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Access to the data used in this study was granted by HQIP on behalf of SSNAP via submission of a data access request. The NHS Health Research Authority granted ethical approval for SSNAP to collect patient data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data used in this study was obtained from the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) UK
