Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Utility of human judgment ensembles during times of pandemic uncertainty: A case study during the COVID-19 Omicron BA.1 wave in the USA

Srinivasan Venkatramanan, Juan Cambeiro, Tom Liptay, Bryan Lewis, Mark Orr, Gaia Dempsey, Alex Telionis, Justin Crow, Chris Barrett, Madhav Marathe
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.12.22280997
Srinivasan Venkatramanan
1Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: srini{at}virginia.edu
Juan Cambeiro
2Metaculus Inc.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Liptay
2Metaculus Inc.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryan Lewis
1Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Orr
1Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gaia Dempsey
2Metaculus Inc.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Telionis
3Virginia Department of Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin Crow
3Virginia Department of Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Barrett
1Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia
4Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madhav Marathe
1Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia
4Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Responding to a rapidly evolving pandemic like COVID-19 is challenging, and involves anticipating novel variants, vaccine uptake, and behavioral adaptations. Human judgment systems can complement computational models by providing valuable real-time forecasts. We report findings from a study conducted on Metaculus, a community forecasting platform, in partnership with the Virginia Department of Health, involving six rounds of forecasting during the Omicron BA.1 wave in the United States from November 2021 to March 2022. We received 8355 probabilistic predictions from 129 unique users across 60 questions pertaining to cases, hospitalizations, vaccine uptake, and peak/trough activity. We observed that the case forecasts performed on par with national multi-model ensembles and the vaccine uptake forecasts were more robust and accurate compared to baseline models. We also identified qualitative shifts in Omicron BA.1 wave prognosis during the surge phase, demonstrating rapid adaptation of such systems. Finally, we found that community estimates of variant characteristics such as growth rate and timing of dominance were in line with the scientific consensus. The observed accuracy, timeliness, and scope of such systems demonstrates the value of incorporating them into pandemic policymaking workflows.

Competing Interest Statement

Juan Cambeiro, Tom Liptay, and Gaia Dempsey are employees of Metaculus.

Funding Statement

This work is partially supported by the Virginia Department of Health (COVID-19 Modeling Program VDH-21-501-0135), National Science Foundation (Collaborative Research: Expeditions: Global Pervasive Computational Epidemiology CCF-1918656), and University of Virginia (Strategic Investment Fund SIF160).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by The University of Virginia Institutional Review Board for Social & Behavioral Sciences.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Metaculus predictions for all the RPDM questions are available for public viewing on the platform (https://www.metaculus.com/tournament/realtimepandemic/). Further, the cleaned data used for analyses is available at (https://github.com/NSSAC/metaculus-rpdm-data). Cases, hospitalizations, and vaccination data were obtained from the public datasets maintained by the Virginia Department of Health (https://data.virginia.gov/Government/VDH-COVID-19-PublicUseDataset-Cases/bre9-aqqr, https://data.virginia.gov/Government/VDH-COVID-19-PublicUseDataset-KeyMeasures-Hospital/28wk-762y, https://data.virginia.gov/Government/VDH-COVID-19-PublicUseDataset-Vaccines-DosesAdmini/28k2-x2rj). Forecasts from COVID-19 Forecast Hub were obtained from their Github repository (https://github.com/reichlab/covid19-forecast-hub).

https://github.com/NSSAC/metaculus-rpdm-data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 13, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Utility of human judgment ensembles during times of pandemic uncertainty: A case study during the COVID-19 Omicron BA.1 wave in the USA
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Utility of human judgment ensembles during times of pandemic uncertainty: A case study during the COVID-19 Omicron BA.1 wave in the USA
Srinivasan Venkatramanan, Juan Cambeiro, Tom Liptay, Bryan Lewis, Mark Orr, Gaia Dempsey, Alex Telionis, Justin Crow, Chris Barrett, Madhav Marathe
medRxiv 2022.10.12.22280997; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.12.22280997
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Utility of human judgment ensembles during times of pandemic uncertainty: A case study during the COVID-19 Omicron BA.1 wave in the USA
Srinivasan Venkatramanan, Juan Cambeiro, Tom Liptay, Bryan Lewis, Mark Orr, Gaia Dempsey, Alex Telionis, Justin Crow, Chris Barrett, Madhav Marathe
medRxiv 2022.10.12.22280997; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.12.22280997

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)