Abstract
Background To date, benefit of successful recanalization of acute stroke has been described mainly for high volume operator.
Purpose To evaluate if a successful MT performed by a low-volume operator is a strong predictor of patient’s good clinical outcome.
Materials and Methods A consecutive monocentric observational study from June 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 at the University Hospital of Poitiers. Patient management included mechanical thrombectomy and eventual IVT. The interventional neuroradiologist on duty classified the recanalization according a standardized mTICI reading grid. ∆mRS was defined as the difference between 90 days and initial mRS. Association were studied using Chi-square test and Pearson’s and Fisher’s correlation with a threshold at 0.05. The main criterion was the reliability between mTICI and ∆mRS.
Results Among the 304 MT, 127 patients were finally included. High mTICI score was significantly associated with high ∆mRS (p = 0.04), using the mTICI dichotomization, patients with successful MT had significantly better outcome than patient with lower mTICI whatever the initial mRS (p = 0.008). There was a correlation between age categories greater than or equal to 80 y.o (p=0.03) and high initial NIHSS categories greater than or equal to 18 (p=0.004) with regard to the ∆mRS. No statistical significance were obtained between sexe (p=0.63), diabetes mellitus (p=0.25), VIT (p=0.16) and thrombus’s lateralization (p=0.26) with regard to ∆mRS.
Conclusion This study highlights the place and performances of low-volume operator in the treatment of acute stroke.
Summary Statement Despite low-volume operators, a successful mechanical thrombectomy is a strong prognostic factor for good clinical outcome.
Key Results
- Mechanical thrombectomy performed in a low volume center is a safe therapy and strongly linked to good clinical outcome.
- Our low volume-operators centre has reached a high reperfusion rate and a majority of good clinical outcome
- This study highlights the place and performances of low-volume operator in the treatment of acute stroke.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Chu de Poitiers gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Abbreviations
- MT
- Mechanical Thrombectomy
- IVT
- Intra Veinous Therapy
- mTICI
- Modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction
- mRS
- Modified Rankin Score
