Selective mutism in China: a nationwide survey and case-control study

Background

Selective mutism (SM) is an anxiety disorder characterized by a consistent failure to speak in particular public settings (e.g., school), while being able to speak normally in other situations (e.g., home) [1,2]. The disorder is listed among the anxiety disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5^th Edition (DSM-5) [2]. To diagnose this disorder, the DSM-5 stipulates that speech inhibition should last for at least one month. The diagnosis cannot be established during the first month at school, where the absence of speech may be attributed to children’s nervousness in an unfamiliar environment instead of a mental disorder. Moreover, according to the DSM-5, the lack of speech is not the result of a lack of familiarity with or discomfort with the spoken language needed in the social situation. In addition, the failure to speak is not better explained by a communication disorder and does not occur exclusively during the course of autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, or another psychotic disorder [2].

The prevalence of SM among children is estimated between 0.03% and 1%, and the mean age of onset is between 2 and 5 years, thus indicating that SM is a relatively rare childhood disorder [1,2]. SM has a mean duration of 8 years, after which the total lack of speech in certain settings usually dissipates [3]. The difficulties associated with SM include speech problems, fears, and social phobia, which can interfere with children’s daily function, and educational and occupational achievement [2,4].

International literature suggests that several sociodemographic and environmental factors may be associated with SM among children. For example, Koskela et al. [5] stated that compared to a child of a mother who was married or in a relationship, the child of a single mother was twice as likely to develop SM. A telephone interview study revealed that the prevalence of SM among immigrant children was 2.2%, while the prevalence among children in native families was 0.5%, indicating that immigrant status is a potential contributing factor to SM development [6]. However, there is only limited evidence of the associations between these factors and children’s SM, and some of these findings remain controversial. For example, Elizur, Perednik [6] suggested that second language acquisition is a major correlate of the development of SM in immigrant children. However, Starke [7] argued that second language acquisition alone could not cause SM. She held the view that although bilingualism is associated with SM in immigrant children, a low orientation to the mainstream culture and anxiety are the major causes and predictors of their mute behavior [7]. The association between maternal age and offspring SM remains controversial as well. While McGrath et al. [8] suggested an association between maternal age and SM among their children, the study by Koskela et al. [5] reported no significant association between these factors.

Several other sociodemographic and environmental variables might also be associated with children’s risk for SM, including parental educational attainment and major life events such as relocation [9-11]. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of knowledge on the relationship between these factors and the onset of SM. Moreover, although Chavira et al. [12] reported that shyness was more common in parents of children with SM, it is unclear whether there is an association between introversion of parents and offspring SM.

In terms of treatment, the international literature suggests that behavioral or cognitive-behavioral interventions and pharmacotherapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective for treating SM [1]. Individualized treatment plans with the combined effort of teachers, parents, and clinics has been recommended to help children overcome SM [13]. However, there are meager data on how families with SM children cope with SM and how they perceive the effectiveness of SM treatments.

Methods

Results

The sample included 172 cases of children suspected of ever having SM and 179 controls who were not suspected of ever having SM. Most participants were female (89.0% of cases; 79.3% of controls) and most households had two parents with a bachelor’s degree (63.4% of cases; 74.3% of controls). Parents of cases were more likely to be over 40 years old, compared to parents of controls (23.8% vs 8.4 %). Additional sociodemographic information is presented in Table 1.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first quantitative study to describe the sociodemographics and experiences of children and families with SM in China. Our findings revealed that only about half of SM cases were diagnosed by a professional, and less than one in three SM cases received treatment guided by a professional. This could be partly due to a paucity of both trained professionals experienced with SM and special support from educational institutions. Although children with special needs have been increasingly educated in mainstream classrooms within China, mainstream public schools often lack the resources and organization needed to meet such students’ needs [29]. The relatively large size of classrooms (often ≥40 students in urban settings) [30] constrains the time regular classroom teachers can devote to students with special needs. Teachers tasked with supporting students with special needs often have limited special education training and may need to take on such duties in addition to other job duties, but without additional financial compensation [31]. In more developed regions, private professional therapists can be hired to implement SM treatment programs in school settings, but may be prohibitively expensive for many if not most families. Due to the fact that many children with SM do not exhibit any intellectual disability, there is a very real risk that educators in mainstream schools may incorrectly attribute SM behavior to shyness or introversion, rather than a recognized anxiety disorder [32]. In fact, anecdotal evidence from the SMAC suggests that many children in China living with SM demonstrate relatively high academic achievement. Greater access to special education resources and SM interventions are needed in China.

Results from our study also indicated that SM is a substantial source of stress for both parents and their children in China. Part of this stress may be exacerbated by parent-teacher relations, wherein parents are expected to be personally engaged with their child’s studies and provide at-home support as the teacher requests [30]. It is conceivable that homework and at-home “make-up” assignments may be greater for students with SM that are unable to participate in school activities that require verbal communication. Given that speech becomes increasingly salient for developing social bonds and communication skills as the child ages, it is likely that SM-attributed stress will only increase over time unless SM symptoms are resolved. In the interest of the well-being of the child and their parents, it is imperative that SM treatment begin as soon as possible for the child [32-34]. Chinese language resources for therapists and parents of children with SM are growing, but have been relatively sparse to date with a few exceptions [35].

Previous research from outside Asia has suggested that genetics and parental personality has a strong influence on SM onset [1]. Findings from our sample from China corroborate these previous studies, with SM cases having significantly greater odds of two introverted parents. However, contrary to our original expectations, having a sibling was positively associated with SM. This association could be confounded by unmeasured effects of socioeconomic status, but could not be assessed in the present study. As more families have multiple children following the end of the “one child policy,” future research should examine how sibling dynamics may or may not be influencing SM onset in China.

Advanced maternal age was strongly associated with SM in the current study, but we can only speculate upon the mechanism of association. A large nationwide study from Finland found advanced maternal age to be significantly associated with SM in unadjusted models, but was no longer significantly associated with SM after psychopathology of parents was controlled for Koskela et al. [5]. It is conceivable that parental psychopathologies can be confounding the association between advanced maternal age and child SM, but it is also possible that maternal psychopathologies are mediating the effects of advanced maternal age on child SM [36]. Longitudinal studies are needed to disentangle the relationship between maternal age, maternal psychopathologies, and SM in offspring.

In contrast to the earlier research by Elizur, Perednik [6], we found an inverse association between bilingual education and SM. Nearly all of our samples (98.6%) were of Chinese nationality and resided in China. Therefore, the cross-cultural conflict they experienced in daily life might be limited. As suggested by previous research, cross-cultural conflict experienced by immigrant children could be one of the main causes of their mute behavior and the mediator of the association between bilingualism and SM among them [7]. Similarly, we also found that children who ever enrolled in an international school in China had lower odds of SM. However, the association between bilingual education and international school and SM might be underestimated given that the confounding effect of family income was not controlled. According to Koskela et al. [5], people of lowest social economic status were more likely to have children with SM. Furthermore, children from low-income family are generally less likely to go to bilingual and international school due to the high costs.

Conclusions

Access to SM treatment in China remains low, and is likely driven by lack of awareness and insufficient resources at medical and educational institutions. This is problematic because SM has adverse implications for childhood development and appears to be a concerning source of stress for the child and their parents. Given the severe dearth of SM research from China, it is incumbent for Chinese researchers, educators, clinicians, and policy makers to collaboratively develop novel approaches to more effectively detect, and treat SM.