ABSTRACT
Objective This study assessed the relationships between the auditory nerve’s ability to recovery from neural adaptation, cortical encoding of and perceptual sensitivity to within-channel temporal gaps in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant (CI) users.
Design Study participants included 11 postlingually deafened adults with Cochlear™ Nucleus® devices, including three bilaterally implanted participants. In each participant, recovery from neural adaptation of the auditory nerve (AN) was measured using electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) at up to four electrode locations. The electrode pair with the largest difference in the speed of adaptation recovery was selected for assessing within-channel temporal gap detection threshold (GDT). GDTs were measured using both psychophysical and electrophysiological procedures. Psychophysical GDTs were evaluated using a three-alternative, forced-choice procedure, targeting 79.4% correct on the psychometric function. Electrophysiological GDTs were measured using the electrically evoked auditory change complex (eACC) evoked by electrical pulse trains that contained temporal gaps. Objective GDT was defined as the shortest temporal gap that could evoke an eACC. Related-samples Wilcoxon Signed Rank testwas used to compare psychophysical GDTs and objective GDTs measured at all electrode locations. It was also used to compare psychophysical GDTs and objective GDTs measured at the two electrode locations with different speeds or amounts of adaptation recovery of the AN. A Kendall Rank correlation test was used to assess the correlation between GDTs measured using psychophysical or electrophysiological procedures.
Results Objective GDTs were significantly larger than those measured using psychophysical procedures. There was a significant correlation between objective and psychophysical GDTs. GDTs could not be predicted based on the amount or the speed of adaptation recovery of the AN.
Conclusions Electrophysiological measure of the eACC can potentially be used to assess within-channel GDT in CI users who cannot provide reliable behavioral responses. The difference in adaptation recovery of the AN is not the primary factor accounting for the across-electrode variation in GDT in individual CI users.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the R01 grant from NIDCD/NIGMS (1R01DC016038).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Biomedical Institutional Review Board of The Ohio State University gave ethical approval for this work (2017H0131).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: None.
Source of Funding: This work was supported by the R01 grant from NIDCD/NIGMS (1R01DC016038).
Data Availability
Please contact the corresponding author to discuss access to the data presented in this study.
