Abstract
Measuring cognition in an aging population is a public health priority. A move towards survey measurement via the web (as opposed to phone or in-person) is cost effective but challenging as it may induce bias in cognitive measures. We examine this possibility using an experiment embedded in the 2018 wave of data collection for the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS). We find evidence of an increase in scores for HRS respondents who are randomly assigned to the web-based mode of data collection in 2018. Web-based respondents score higher in 2018 than do phone-based respondents, and they show much larger gains relative to 2016 performance and subsequently larger declines in 2020. The bias in favor of web-based responding is observed across all item types, but most pronounced for the serial 7 and items on financial literacy. These results imply a larger threshold for web-based respondents in applications requiring an indicator of cognitive impairment. Implications for both use of HRS data and future survey work on cognition are discussed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was funded in part by the Jacobs Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study only used openly available data that are located at: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/data-products
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵† bdomingu{at}stanford.edu
Data Availability
All data in the present work are available from the HRS website: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/data-products.
