Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Segmentation

View ORCID ProfileArman Avesta, Sajid Hossain, MingDe Lin, Mariam Aboian, View ORCID ProfileHarlan M. Krumholz, Sanjay Aneja
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.03.22281923
Arman Avesta
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
2Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
3Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Arman Avesta
Sajid Hossain
2Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
3Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MingDe Lin
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
4Visage Imaging, Inc., San Diego, CA 92130
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariam Aboian
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harlan M. Krumholz
3Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
6Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Harlan M. Krumholz
Sanjay Aneja
2Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
3Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510
5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510
MD.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sanjay.aneja{at}yale.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Deep-learning methods for auto-segmenting brain images either segment one slice of the image (2D), five consecutive slices of the image (2.5D), or an entire volume of the image (3D). Whether one approach is superior for auto-segmenting brain images is not known.

We compared these three approaches (3D, 2.5D, and 2D) across three auto-segmentation models (capsule networks, UNets, and nnUNets) to segment brain structures. We used 3430 brain MRIs, acquired in a multi-institutional study, to train and test our models. We used the following performance metrics: segmentation accuracy, performance with limited training data, required computational memory, and computational speed during training and deployment.

3D, 2.5D, and 2D approaches respectively gave the highest to lowest Dice scores across all models. 3D models maintained higher Dice scores when the training set size was decreased from 3199 MRIs down to 60 MRIs. 3D models converged 20% to 40% faster during training and were 30% to 50% faster during deployment. However, 3D models require 20 times more computational memory compared to 2.5D or 2D models.

This study showed that 3D models are more accurate, maintain better performance with limited training data, and are faster to train and deploy. However, 3D models require more computational memory compared to 2.5D or 2D models.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Arman Avesta is a PhD Student in the Investigative Medicine Program at Yale which is supported by CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR001863 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This work was also supported by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Fellow Research Grant Number RF2212. The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIH or RSNA.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

the data used in this study were obtained from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). We obtained T1-weighted MRIs of 3430 patients in the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study from this data-sharing platform. The investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI but did not participate in the analysis or writing of this article.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Figure 2 is updated, and the text is revised to include a few updates.

Data Availability

the data used in this study were obtained from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database available at: adni.loni.usc.edu.

https://adni.loni.usc.edu/

  • Abbreviations

    2D segmentation
    two-dimensional segmentation
    2.5D segmentation
    enhanced two-dimensional segmentation
    3D segmentation
    three-dimensional segmentation
    ADNI
    Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative
    CapsNet
    capsule network
    CPU
    central processing unit
    CT
    computed tomography
    GB
    giga-byte
    GPU
    graphics processing unit
    MRI
    magnetic resonance imaging
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted November 21, 2022.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Segmentation
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Segmentation
    Arman Avesta, Sajid Hossain, MingDe Lin, Mariam Aboian, Harlan M. Krumholz, Sanjay Aneja
    medRxiv 2022.11.03.22281923; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.03.22281923
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Segmentation
    Arman Avesta, Sajid Hossain, MingDe Lin, Mariam Aboian, Harlan M. Krumholz, Sanjay Aneja
    medRxiv 2022.11.03.22281923; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.03.22281923

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Radiology and Imaging
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)