Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Diagnosing early-onset neonatal sepsis in low-resource settings: development of a multivariable prediction model

View ORCID ProfileSamuel R. Neal, Felicity Fitzgerald, Simbarashe Chimhuya, Michelle Heys, Mario Cortina-Borja, Gwendoline Chimhini
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.19.22282335
Samuel R. Neal
aPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
bInfection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
MRes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Samuel R. Neal
Felicity Fitzgerald
bInfection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simbarashe Chimhuya
cChild and Adolescent Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
MMED
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Heys
aPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
dSpecialist Children’s and Young People’s Services, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
MD(Res)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.heys{at}ucl.ac.uk
Mario Cortina-Borja
aPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gwendoline Chimhini
cChild and Adolescent Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
MMED
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objective To develop a clinical prediction model to diagnose neonatal sepsis in low-resource settings.

Design Secondary analysis of data collected by the Neotree digital health system from 01/02/2019 to 31/03/2020. We used multivariable logistic regression with candidate predictors identified from expert opinion and literature review. Missing data were imputed using multivariate imputation and model performance was evaluated in the derivation cohort.

Setting A tertiary neonatal unit at Sally Mugabe Central Hospital, Zimbabwe.

Patients We included 2628 neonates aged <72 hours, gestation ≥ 32+0 weeks and birth weight ≥ 1500 grams.

Interventions Participants received standard care as no specific interventions were dictated by the study protocol.

Main outcome measures Clinical early-onset neonatal sepsis (within the first 72 hours of life), defined by the treating consultant neonatologist.

Results Clinical early-onset sepsis was diagnosed in 297 neonates (11.3%). The optimal model included eight predictors: maternal fever, offensive liquor, prolonged rupture of membranes, neonatal temperature, respiratory rate, activity, chest retractions and grunting. Receiver operating characteristic analysis gave an area under the curve of 0.736 (95% confidence interval 0.701-0.772). For a sensitivity of 95% (92-97%), corresponding specificity was 11% (10-13%), positive predictive value 12% (11-13%), negative predictive value 95% (92-97%), positive likelihood ratio 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.1), and negative likelihood ratio 0.4 (95% CI 0.3-0.6).

Conclusions Our clinical prediction model achieved high sensitivity with modest specificity, suggesting it may be suited to excluding early-onset sepsis. Future work will validate and refine this model before considering it for clinical use within the Neotree.

What is already known on this topic Various clinical prediction models exist to diagnose neonatal sepsis. However, there is a paucity of literature on models in low-resource settings, particularly sub-Saharan Africa.

What this study adds We developed a clinical prediction model to diagnose clinical early-onset neonatal sepsis with over 2,500 neonates in a lower middle-income, low-resource neonatal unit. Our model is easy to implement, does not require laboratory tests and achieved high sensitivity with modest specificity in the derivation cohort.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy Our model could support less experienced healthcare professionals avoid unnecessary antibiotic therapy in the absence of immediate local senior support. Before implementation, this model must be externally validated and its impact on sepsis-related neonatal morbidity and mortality must be assessed in future studies.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. Funders of the wider Neotree project, past and present, include the Wellcome Trust Digital Innovation Award, RCPCH, Naughton-Cliffe Mathews, UCL Grand Challenges and Global Engagement Fund, and the Healthcare Infection Society. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Research ethics approval was granted by the University College London Research Ethics Committee (16915/001, 5019/004), Medical Research Council Zimbabwe (MRCZ/A/2570), and Sally Mugabe Central Hospital Ethics Committee (250418/48).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

An open-source, anonymised research database is planned as part of the wider Neotree project. Currently, sharing of deidentified individual participant data will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

  • Abbreviations

    AIC
    Akaike’s information criterion
    AUC
    area under the curve
    BIC
    Bayesian information criterion
    CI
    confidence interval
    EOS
    early-onset neonatal sepsis
    GBS
    Group B streptococcus
    HCP
    healthcare professional
    IQR
    interquartile range
    LRS
    low-resource settings
    OR
    odds ratio
    ROC
    receiver operating characteristic
    SD
    standard deviation
    SE
    standard error
    SMCH
    Sally Mugabe Central Hospital.
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted November 20, 2022.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Diagnosing early-onset neonatal sepsis in low-resource settings: development of a multivariable prediction model
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Diagnosing early-onset neonatal sepsis in low-resource settings: development of a multivariable prediction model
    Samuel R. Neal, Felicity Fitzgerald, Simbarashe Chimhuya, Michelle Heys, Mario Cortina-Borja, Gwendoline Chimhini
    medRxiv 2022.11.19.22282335; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.19.22282335
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Diagnosing early-onset neonatal sepsis in low-resource settings: development of a multivariable prediction model
    Samuel R. Neal, Felicity Fitzgerald, Simbarashe Chimhuya, Michelle Heys, Mario Cortina-Borja, Gwendoline Chimhini
    medRxiv 2022.11.19.22282335; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.19.22282335

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Pediatrics
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)