Abstract
Background Most studies on machine learning classification of electrocardiogram (ECG) diagnoses focus on processing raw signal data rather than ECG images. In clinical practice, it is often the case where ECGs printed on paper or only digital images are easily accessible. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of image based deep learning algorithms on 12 lead ECG diagnosis.
Methods Deep learning models were trained on various 12-lead ECG datasets and evaluated for accuracy by testing on holdout test data as well as data from datasets not seen in training.
Results The results demonstrated excellent AUROC, AUPRC, sensitivity and specificity on holdout test data from datasets used in training, but poorer accuracy on unseen datasets.
Discussion This study demonstrates feasibility of image based deep learning algorithms in ECG diagnosis, and identifies directions for future research in order to develop clinically applicable deep-learning models in ECG diagnosis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Self funded
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No ethics approval was required. All data used has already been published and are publicly available.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used is publicly available
http://2018.icbeb.org/Challenge.html
