Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists

Miranda L. G. Hallquist, Maia J. Borensztein, Curtis R. Coughlin II, Adam H. Buchanan, W. Andrew Faucett, Holly L. Peay, Maureen E. Smith, Eric P. Tricou, Wendy R. Uhlmann, Karen E. Wain, the CADRe workgroup, Kelly E. Ormond
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.22.22282640
Miranda L. G. Hallquist
1Geisinger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mhallquist{at}geisinger.edu
Maia J. Borensztein
2Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Curtis R. Coughlin II
3Department of Pediatrics and Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam H. Buchanan
1Geisinger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Andrew Faucett
1Geisinger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holly L. Peay
4RTI International, Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maureen E. Smith
5Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric P. Tricou
1Geisinger
2Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendy R. Uhlmann
6Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine; Department of Human Genetics; Center for Bioethics & Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen E. Wain
1Geisinger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly E. Ormond
2Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine
7Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine
8Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Consent and Disclosure Recommendation (CADRe) framework proposes that key components of informed consent for genetic testing can be covered with a targeted discussion for many conditions rather than a time-intensive traditional genetic counseling approach. We surveyed US genetics professionals (medical geneticists and genetic counselors) on their response to scenarios that proposed core informed consent concepts for clinical genetic testing developed in a prior expert consensus process. The anonymous online survey included responses to 3 (of 6 possible) different clinical scenarios that summarized the application of the core concepts. There was a binary (yes/no) question asking respondents whether they agreed the scenarios included the minimum necessary and critical educational concepts to allow an informed decision. Respondents then provided open-ended feedback on what concepts were missing or could be removed. At least one scenario was completed by 238 respondents. For all but one scenario, over 65% of respondents agreed that the identified concepts portrayed were sufficient for an informed decision; the exome scenario had the lowest agreement (58%). Qualitative analysis of the open-ended comments showed no consistently mentioned concepts to add or remove. The level of agreement with the example scenarios suggests that the minimum critical educational components for pre-test informed consent proposed in our prior work is a strong starting place for clinicians to provide targeted pre-test discussions. This may be helpful in providing consistency to the clinical practice of both genetics and non-genetics providers, and in future guideline development.

Competing Interest Statement

●AHB has received compensation as a section editor for the Journal of Genetic Counseling and holds an equity stake in MeTree and You, Inc. ●WRU receives book royalties from Wiley-Blackwell. ●MES has received compensation as a section editor for the Journal of Genetic Counseling ●Remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers: U41HG009650 and U41HG009649. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Stanford IRB reviewed this study as exempt, and all aspects adhered to the principles in the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants reviewed an informed consent document before choosing to participate in this study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and/or are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author, M.L.G.H.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 28, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists
Miranda L. G. Hallquist, Maia J. Borensztein, Curtis R. Coughlin II, Adam H. Buchanan, W. Andrew Faucett, Holly L. Peay, Maureen E. Smith, Eric P. Tricou, Wendy R. Uhlmann, Karen E. Wain, the CADRe workgroup, Kelly E. Ormond
medRxiv 2022.11.22.22282640; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.22.22282640
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists
Miranda L. G. Hallquist, Maia J. Borensztein, Curtis R. Coughlin II, Adam H. Buchanan, W. Andrew Faucett, Holly L. Peay, Maureen E. Smith, Eric P. Tricou, Wendy R. Uhlmann, Karen E. Wain, the CADRe workgroup, Kelly E. Ormond
medRxiv 2022.11.22.22282640; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.22.22282640

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)