Abstract
Objectives An end-to-end method is introduced to build a combined segmentation-classification pipeline using deep learning for opportunistic fracture detection in CT spine images of varying field-of-views.
Materials and Methods This retrospective study builds on 452 CTs of the lumbar/thoracolumbar spine. Patients were included based on the evidence of ≥ 1 vertebral body fracture and excluded in case of history of spinal surgery or pathologic fractures. The collective was split into training/validation (405) and test (47) sets. An open-source pre-segmented spine dataset was used to train a preliminary segmentation model, which was applied on the training set. The resulting segmentation was post-processed to remove posterior vertebral structures and if needed manually refined by a radiologist. Using the refined version as new training data, a final segmentation nnU-net was trained. Sagittal slices from each vertebra were labelled individually with regard to fracture evidence. Slices without signs of fracture were used as negative class. 27,019 slices (20,396 negative, 6,623 positive) trained a classification algorithm using resnet18. Two senior readers independently assessed fractures in the test set to obtain a consensual ground truth. The segmentation-classification pipeline was applied to the test set and compared to the ground truth.
Results The segmentation model correctly segmented 330/339 (97%) vertebrae. Considering every segmented vertebra, the classifier detected fractures with 88% sensitivity, 95% specificity and 93% accuracy.
Conclusion Our two-step method can help to detect spine fractures on images of varying field-of-views, with an accuracy comparable to that of a radiologist in-training. The final models as well as our code material are available at https://github.com/usb-radiology/VertebraeFx.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of the University Hospital Basel gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All code data in the present study are available online at https://github.com/usbradiology/VertebraeFx.
