Abstract
Purpose To describe the current landscape of virtual morning report (VMR) in medical residency education including its varying formats, methods, and associated effectiveness on learning and clinical outcomes.
Methods The authors conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O’Malley methodology. They searched Embase, OvidMEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed between January 1, 1991 to April 15, 2022. Articles written in English on virtual morning report and virtual case-based teaching in medical residency programs were captured. Two authors independently screened articles using the inclusion criteria. Using a snowball approach, further citations were identified from included references. Two authors performed data extraction including outcomes using the Kirkpatrick model. We conducted thematic analysis using an iterative process.
Results A total of 401 citations were screened for eligibility and we included 40 articles. The number of published studies per year on VMR increased since the COVID-19 pandemic. Most studies used online case-based modules (n=20; 50.0%) or videoconferencing (n=12; 30.0%). The majority of studies described improved confidence with clinical reasoning, easy access, and preference for chatboxes/polls for engagement (Kirpatrick level 1). Nineteen studies demonstrated improved knowledge acquisition with pre-and post-test scores (Kirkpatrick level 2). Behaviour changes (Kirkpatrick level 3) included improved screening tests and medication prescribing. There were no studies on clinical outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4). Thematic analyses revealed that VMR increased clinical reasoning, efficiently used technology, provided an inclusive environment for diverse learners, but reduced peer engagement and bedside teaching.
Conclusion Virtual morning report has a positive impact on learner confidence, knowledge, inclusivity, accessibility, and behaviour change. Future research is needed to explore the impact on patient outcomes as well as identify strategies for peer engagement and social interaction.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Co-first authors
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
