Abstract
Ambulance waiting times across the UK have increased in recent years. The numbers of ambulance staff leaving services across the UK is increasing every year. Strategies to help recruit and retain all ambulance staff, including paramedics are important. This rapid evidence summary aimed to investigate what innovations can help with their recruitment and retention.
Eight primary studies were identified:
Recruitment Evidence from a UK survey suggests that factors negatively influencing paramedic recruitment include competitive job market, lack of locally trained professionals, and newly qualified professionals starting with higher debt. Evidence from the US suggests that factors supporting recruitment concern future paramedics wanting to enter a caring profession or an exciting job. Additionally, strategies to recruit emergency medical technicians need to include the motivational aspects of growth, advancement, recognition, and responsibility. Evidence indicates that factors hindering recruitment of emergency medical technicians and/ or paramedics include rural working, and ambulance services not seen as a primary career path.
Retention Evidence from a UK survey suggests that pay, reward, stress and workload are factors that hinder paramedic retention. Evidence recommends retention strategies for paramedics, such as reviewing banding, improving work conditions and career progression, changing the way ambulances are dispatched to calls, and providing retention premiums. Evidence from the US suggests that pay, benefits, opportunities for advancement, continuous professional development, burnout, stress, workload, nearing retirement and career change are factors that influence retention of emergency medical technicians and/ or paramedics. Evidence from Thailand suggests that remuneration and professionalism are factors supporting paramedic retention.
More up-to-date information is needed on the recruitment and retention of ambulance staff in UK settings. Further research providing a more detailed investigation of factors influencing recruitment and retention may be useful. The development or implementation of future strategies to help the recruitment and retention of paramedics and emergency medical technicians should be accompanied by a planned impact evaluation.
Funding statement The Wales Centre For Evidence Based Care was funded for this work by the Wales Covid-19 Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health & Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.
Rapid Evidence Summary Details
Review conducted by
Review conducted by The Wales Centre For Evidence Based Care
Review Team
Review Team
▪ Deborah Edwards
▪ Judit Csontos
▪ Liz Gillen
▪ Judith Carrier
Review TeamReview submitted to the WCEC on: 24th November 2022
Stakeholder consultation meeting: 14th November 2022
Rapid Evidence Summary report issued by the WCEC in: December 2022
WCEC Team: Ruth Lewis, Adrian Edwards, Alison Cooper and Micaela Gal involved in drafting the Topline Summary and editing.
This review should be cited as
This review should be cited as RES00050, Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre. A rapid evidence summary of what innovations help with the recruitment and retention of ambulance staff. November 2022
Disclaimer
Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors, not necessarily Health and Care Research Wales. The WCEC and authors of this work declare that they have no conflict of interest.
TOPLINE SUMMARY
What is a Rapid Evidence Summary?
What is a Rapid Evidence Summary?Our Rapid Evidence Summaries (RES) are designed to provide an interim evidence briefing to inform further work and provide early access to key findings. They are based on a limited search of key resources and the assessment of abstracts. Priority is given to studies representing robust evidence synthesis. No quality appraisal or evidence synthesis are conducted, and the summary should be interpreted with caution.
Who is this summary for?
Who is this summary for?Welsh Ambulance Service NHS Trust
Background / Aim of Rapid Evidence Summary
Background / Aim of Rapid Evidence Summary Ambulance waiting times across the UK have increased in recent years, with emergency service performance targets missed. Reasons for the decreasing performance include increasing demand, problems with moving patients through the system, and workforce issues. The numbers of ambulance staff leaving services across the UK is increasing every year with the most acute retention problems affecting paramedics. Strategies to help recruit and retain all ambulance staff, including paramedics are important, therefore this rapid evidence summary aims to investigate what innovations can help with their recruitment and retention.
Key Findings
Key Findings Eight primary studies were identified.
Extent of the evidence base
Extent of the evidence base
▪ Quantitative descriptive surveys (n=6) and qualitative studies (n=2)
▪ Studies were from USA (n=6), UK (n=1) and Thailand (n=1).
Recency of the evidence base
Recency of the evidence base
▪ The review included evidence available up until October 2022. Included studies were published between 2005 and 2021 with the UK study published in 2015.
Summary of findings
Summary of findings
▪ Participants were paramedics (n=3), emergency medical technicians (EMTs) (n=2), paramedics and EMTs (n=2), and emergency medical service directors (n=1).
▪ Studies focused on factors and strategies influencing ambulance staff recruitment (n=5) and/ or retention (n=7).
Recruitment
Recruitment
▪ Evidence from a UK survey suggests that factors that negatively influence paramedic recruitment include competitive job market, lack of locally trained professionals, and newly qualified professionals starting with higher debt.
▪ Evidence from the US suggests that factors supporting recruitment concern future paramedics wanting to enter a caring profession or an exciting job. Additionally, strategies to recruit EMTs need to include the motivational aspects of growth, advancement, recognition, and responsibility.
▪ Evidence from the US indicates that factors that hinder recruitment of EMTs and/ or paramedics include rural working, and ambulance services not seen as a primary career path.
▪ There were no studies that evaluated the effectiveness of innovations or strategies to improve ambulance staff recruitment.
Retention
Retention
▪ Evidence from a UK survey suggests that pay, reward, stress and workload are factors that hinder paramedic retention.
▪ Evidence from a UK survey recommends retention strategies for paramedics, such as reviewing banding, improving work conditions and career progression, changing the way ambulances are dispatched to calls, and providing retention premiums.
▪ Evidence from the US suggests that pay, benefits, opportunities for advancement, continuous professional development, burnout, stress, workload, nearing retirement and career change are factors that influence retention and job satisfaction of EMTs and/ or paramedics.
▪ Evidence from Thailand suggests that remuneration and professionalism are factors supporting paramedic retention.
▪ There were no studies that evaluated the effectiveness of innovations or strategies to improve ambulance staff retention.
Implications for practice and research
Implications for practice and research
▪ More up-to-date information is needed on the recruitment and retention of ambulance staff in UK settings.
▪ Further research that provides a more detailed investigation of factors influencing recruitment and retention may be useful, in particular regarding reasons for leaving the profession.
▪ The development or implementation of future strategies to help the recruitment and retention of paramedics and EMTs should be accompanied by a planned impact evaluation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Wales Centre For Evidence Based Care was funded for this work by the Wales Covid-19 Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health & Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Abbreviations
- Acronym
- Full Description
- AS
- Ambulance service
- EMS
- Emergency medical service
- EMT
- Emergency medical technician
- HCPC
- Health and Care Professions Council
- LEADS
- Longitudinal EMS attributes and demographic data study
- NASPF
- National Ambulance Strategic Partnership Forum
- NHS
- National Health Service
- RES
- Rapid evidence summary
