Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

To test or not? Xpert MTB/RIF as an alternative to smear microscopy to guide line probe assay testing for drug-resistant tuberculosis

S Pillay, M de Vos, H Sohn, Y Ghebrekristos, T Dolby, RM Warren, G Theron
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.05.22283088
S Pillay
1DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
2National Health Laboratory Services, Green Point, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M de Vos
1DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H Sohn
3Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y Ghebrekristos
2National Health Laboratory Services, Green Point, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T Dolby
2National Health Laboratory Services, Green Point, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RM Warren
1DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Theron
1DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gtheron{at}sun.ac.za
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) revolutionised tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis, however, laboratory decision making on whether widely-used reflex drug susceptibility assays (MTBDRplus, MTBDRsl) are done on specimens is often based on smear microscopy status.

Method We performed receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses using sputum bacterial load measures [smear microscopy grade, Xpert semi-quantitation category and minimum cycle threshold (CTmin) values] for the classification of “likely non-actionable” (not resistant or susceptible) line probe assays results. We evaluated the actionable-to-non-actionable result ratio and pay-offs with missed isoniazid and fluoroquinolone resistance compared to if LPAs were done universally.

Findings Smear-negatives were more likely than smear-positives to generate a non-actionable MTBDRplus [23% (133/559) vs. 4% (15/381)] or MTBDRsl [39% (220/559) vs. 12% (47/381)] result, however, excluding smear-negatives would result in missed rapid diagnoses [e.g., only 51% (273/537) of LPA-diagnosable isoniazid resistance detected if smear-negatives omitted]. Within smear-negatives, testing ≥ “medium” specimens had a high ratio of actionable-to-non-actionable results (12.8 or a 4-fold improvement vs. test all for MTBDRplus, 4.5 or 3-fold improvement for MTBDRsl), which would capture 64% (168/264) and 77% (34/44) of LPA-detectable resistance. If CTmin were used, greater resolution and higher ratios offset against fewer missed resistant cases were obtained.

Conclusion Routinely-generated Xpert quantitative information permits identification of smear-negatives in whom the ratio of actionable-to-non-actionable LPA results may prove acceptably high to laboratories depending on their local contexts. Xpert CTmin or, if unavailable, semiquantitation category should be used to guide reflex DST; permitting the rational expansion of direct DST to certain paucibacillary specimens.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Hain Lifesciences donated MTBDRsl kits and GT and RW have receiving funding from Hain Lifesciences for other studies. Hain Lifesciences had no role in this study. GT acknowledges funding from the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union (RIA2018D-2509, PreFIT; RIA2018D-2493, SeroSelectTB; RIA2020I-3305, CAGE-TB) and the National Institutes of Health (D43TW010350; U01AI152087; U54EB027049; R01AI136894).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (N16/04/045) and Western Province Department of Health (2016/RP18/637).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Samantha Pillay: samanthap{at}sun.ac.za

  • Margaretha de Vos: Margaretha.DeVos{at}finddx.org

  • Hojoon Sohn: hsohn6{at}jhu.edu

  • Yonas Ghebrekristos: yonasg{at}sun.ac.za

  • Tania Dolby: Tania.Dolby{at}nhls.ac.za

  • Rob Mark Warren: rw1{at}sun.ac.za

  • Grant Theron: gtheron{at}sun.ac.za

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 06, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
To test or not? Xpert MTB/RIF as an alternative to smear microscopy to guide line probe assay testing for drug-resistant tuberculosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
To test or not? Xpert MTB/RIF as an alternative to smear microscopy to guide line probe assay testing for drug-resistant tuberculosis
S Pillay, M de Vos, H Sohn, Y Ghebrekristos, T Dolby, RM Warren, G Theron
medRxiv 2022.12.05.22283088; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.05.22283088
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
To test or not? Xpert MTB/RIF as an alternative to smear microscopy to guide line probe assay testing for drug-resistant tuberculosis
S Pillay, M de Vos, H Sohn, Y Ghebrekristos, T Dolby, RM Warren, G Theron
medRxiv 2022.12.05.22283088; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.05.22283088

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)