ABSTRACT
Successful communication in daily life frequently depends on accurate decoding of speech signals that are acoustically degraded by challenging listening conditions. This process presents the brain with a demanding computational task that is vulnerable to neurodegenerative pathologies. However, despite recent intense interest in the link between hearing impairment and dementia, daily hearing measures (such as degraded speech comprehension) in these diseases remain poorly defined. Here we addressed this issue in a cohort of 19 patients with typical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and 31 patients representing canonical syndromes of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), in relation to 25 healthy age-matched controls. As a model paradigm for the acoustically degraded speech signals of daily life, we used noise-vocoding: synthetic division of the speech signal into a variable number of frequency channels constituted from amplitude-modulated white noise, such that fewer channels convey less spectrotemporal detail thereby reducing intelligibility. We investigated the impact of noise-vocoding on recognition of spoken three-digit numbers and used psychometric modelling to ascertain the threshold number of noise-vocoding channels required for 50% intelligibility by each participant. Associations of noise-vocoded speech intelligibility threshold with general demographic, clinical and neuropsychological characteristics and regional grey matter volume (defined by voxel-based morphometry of patients’ brain MR images) were also assessed. Compared with healthy older controls, all patient groups had a significantly higher mean noise-vocoded speech intelligibility threshold, particularly marked in logopenic variant and nonfluent-agrammatic variant PPA and significantly higher in AD than in semantic variant PPA (all p<0.05). Noise-vocoded intelligibility threshold discriminated dementia syndromes (in particular, Alzheimer’s disease) well from healthy controls. Further, this central hearing measure correlated with overall disease severity but not with measures of peripheral hearing or clear speech perception. Neuroanatomically, after correcting for multiple voxel-wise comparisons in pre-defined regions of interest, impaired noise-vocoded speech comprehension across dementia syndromes was significantly associated (p<0.05) with atrophy of left planum temporale, angular gyrus and anterior cingulate gyrus: a cortical network widely implicated in processing degraded speech signals. Taken together, our findings suggest that the comprehension of acoustically altered speech captures a central process relevant to daily hearing and communication in major dementia syndromes, with novel diagnostic and therapeutic implications.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Dementia Research Centre is supported by Alzheimer's Research UK, Brain Research Trust, and The Wolfson Foundation. The work was supported by the Alzheimer's Society (grant AS-PG-16-007 to JDW), the Royal National Institute for Deaf People, Alzheimer's Research UK and the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. This research was funded in part by the Wellcome Trust (grant no. 102129/B/13/Z), UK Research and Innovation and National Institute of Health Research [NIHR204280]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. For the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. JJ is supported by a Frontotemporal Dementia Research Studentship in Memory of David Blechner (funded through The National Brain Appeal). JCSJ was supported by an Association of British Neurologists Clinical Research Training Fellowship. MCRK was supported by a Wellcome Trust PhD studentship (102129/B/13/Z). EB was supported by a Brain Research UK PhD Studentship. HS was funded by a Clinical Research Fellowship from the Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre. AV is supported by an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (NIHR302240). CRM is supported by grants from Bart's Charity and the National Institute for Health Research [NIHR204280]. RSW is supported by a Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (205167/Z/16/Z). DEB is supported by the Royal National Institute for Deaf People. CJDH acknowledges funding from a RNID-Dunhill Medical Trust Pauline Ashley Fellowship (grant PA23_Hardy), a Wellcome Institutional Strategic Support Fund Award (204841/Z/16/Z) and the National Institute for Health Research [NIHR204280].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted by the UCL-NHNN Joint Research Ethics Committees, in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki guidelines.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* joint senior authors
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. The data are not publicly available because they contain information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.
