Abstract
Introduction Emerging evidence suggests that major sporting tournaments are associated with increased birth rates 9 months afterwards. This increase has been attributed to the celebratory atmosphere encouraging more conception through increased sexual activity among the populace.
Methods Studies that examined the relationship between a major sporting tournament and altered birth metrics (number of births and/or birth sex ratio, defined as male divided by total live births) 9(±1) months later were sought out systematically through searches of PubMed and Scopus. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed in conducting this study.
Results Five major sporting tournaments were linked to noticeably increased birth metrics 9(±1) months later. The Super Bowl (increased United States birth sex ratio in multiple years, however, from 2004 to 2013 there were no observable birth increases in winning counties and losing was not associated with a changed number of births), the 2009 UEFA Champions League (16% increase in Solsonès and Bages births in Spain), the 2010 FIFA World Cup (increased birth sex ratio and over 1000 extra births in South Africa), the 2016 UEFA Euros (2% increase in Northern Ireland births) and the 2019 Rugby World Cup (increased birth sex ratio in some Japanese prefectures). Nine months after the most popular provincial la Liga soccer teams unexpectedly lost matches, there were 0.8% fewer births in those provinces from 2001 to 2015; the number of births were unaffected by unexpected wins. After the 1998 FIFA World Cup a changed sex ratio at birth was not witnessed 9 months on. Nine months following a performance improvement of one standard deviation by a European national soccer team at the FIFA World Cup or UEFA Euro Championships, from 1960 to 2016, there was a 0.3% decline in births 9 months on.
Conclusions With a few exceptions, major American football, Association football (soccer) and Rugby apex tournaments in Africa, North America, Asia and Europe were associated with increases in the number of babies born and/or in the birth sex ratio 9(±1) months following notable team wins and/or hosting the tournament. Related to this, unexpected losses by teams from a premier soccer league were associated with a decline in births 9 months on. In conclusion, Nelson Mandela was correct when he averred, “Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire, it has the power to unite people in a way that little else does.”
PROSPERO registration CRD42022382971
Introduction
A rise in the number of births 9 months later has been linked, in some settings, to a variety of events, including carnivals, religious and secular holidays such as Christmas and New Year’s Day (January 1).1-3 This increase has been attributed to the holiday celebrations encouraging more conception, 9 months earlier,4 through increased sexual activity among the populace.
Sports are a dominant part of culture around the world, with major sporting tournaments attracting millions of attendees and even billions of viewers.5 It is important to consider how the outcomes of these tournaments affect population-level demographics because fans often have a deep investment in the triumph of their beloved teams which may influence fertility.6 Emerging evidence suggests that major sporting tournaments are also associated with increased birth rates 9 months afterwards. For instance, in Northern Ireland (NI), 9 months after the 2016 Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) Euros Championship, in which NI was competing for the first time, a 2% rise in births was observed in March 2017.7 Nine months following Futbol Club Barcelona’s victory in the 2009 UEFA Champion’s league, there was a considerable 16% increase in births in Catalonia.8 On the other hand, it has been reported that 9 months following the United States (US) National Football’s Super Bowl, the number of births in winning cities did not rise.9 However, the US sex ratio at birth (SRB), defined as male divided by total live births, increased 9 months after several Super Bowls.10 Nine months after the 2010 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup, there were over 1000 more live births, and the SRB was higher.11, 12 In addition, there have been several anecdotal media stories about baby booms 9 months after sporting tournaments, for instance a boom in Iceland after the 2016 UEFA Euros Championship, but subsequent statistical analyses of birth data has not supported these claims.13 In contrast to the aforementioned, but consistent with the paradigm, unexpected losses of Spanish local soccer teams have been reported to lead to a 0.8% decrease in the local number of births 9 months later.14
Given the sometimes conflicting and inconsistent reports, our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the literature evaluating the relationship between sporting events and live birth rate/proportion changes 9(±1) months later. If sporting events alter birth patterns significantly, this could have an impact on the need for midwifery, medical and other healthcare personnel as well as resources.
Methods
The protocol for this systematic review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards.15 This review was registered on the International prospective register of systematic reviews site PROSPERO, CRD42022382971.
Search strategy
A search strategy and search terms were developed for this study. Without regard to language, a systematic literature search was conducted. Using the search strategy (Table 1), potentially relevant studies were looked up from database inception through to 7 November 2022 in the electronic databases PubMed and Scopus. The first author carried out all searches. The following search term syntax was used:
Search terms used to identify relevant studies.
PubMed: “Sports”[Mesh] AND (“Birth Rate”[Mesh] OR “Sex ratio”[MESH] OR “Fertility”[MESH])
Scopus: KEY (“sports”) AND KEY (“birth”) OR KEY (“birth rate”) OR KEY (“fertility”)
Using Covidence systematic review software (www.covidence.org), we completed the title/abstract and full-text screening for this study. This was performed independently by two authors (GM and MR). The reference lists of the studies that were included in the search were manually searched as an add-on. The ‘cited by’ function of Google Scholar was also used to find articles citing the included studies.
Eligibility
Table 2 lists the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were employed in this study.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Data extraction
Data were extracted from the included studies by two reviewers (GM and MR). Author name and year, country or region of the tournament, sport and change in birth pattern (total births/SRB) were extracted. Extraction differences were discussed by these two authors and were resolved.
Quality assessment
As far as we are aware, there is no instrument that has been validated for use in evaluating the quality of ecological studies.16 However, the group exposure (sporting tournament) was assessed according to how the population that experienced the tournament defined it; in other words, there was common understanding that the sporting tournament was significant, and the studies characterized it as such. There was minimal concern about outcome bias because the human live birth statistics of the entire population (and not just a sample) was available and the danger of misclassifying sex at birth is low.17
Results
The search strategy was used to find 111 and 332 articles from PubMed and Scopus respectively. After uploading the search results into Covidence and removing 12 duplicates the authors (GM and MR) evaluated each of the remaining 431 articles’ titles and abstracts individually (Figure 1). After examining all titles and abstracts independently, these authors convened to discuss and resolve any differences. All differences were resolved. Six articles remained (Figure 1). An additional 4 articles were found by citation searching. The final data extraction included all 10 of the articles that made it to the full-text screening stage. The characteristics of sporting events with altered birth rates or SRB 9(±1) months later are listed in Table 3. Major American football, Association football (soccer) and rugby championships were linked to increases in the number of births and/or birth sex ratio 9(±1) months after notable team victories and/or the tournament’s hosting. Related to this, a drop in birth rates 9 months later was linked to a team from a top soccer league suffering unexpected losses (Table 3).
Characteristics of included sporting tournaments.
Flow chart of studies identified for inclusion.
Discussion
Principle findings
In this study, we found that five major sporting tournaments were linked to noticeably increased birth metrics 9(±1) months later. The Super Bowl (increased US birth sex ratio in multiple years,10 however, from 2004 to 2013 there were no observable birth increases in winning counties and losing was not associated with a changed number of births9), the 2009 UEFA Champions League (16% increase in Solsonès and Bages births in Spain8), the 2010 FIFA World Cup (increased birth sex ratio11 and over 1000 extra births in South Africa12), the 2016 UEFA Euros (2% increase in Northern Ireland births7) and the 2019 Rugby World Cup (increased birth sex ratio in some Japanese prefectures18). Nine months after the most popular provincial la Liga soccer teams unexpectedly lost matches, there were 0.8% fewer births in those provinces from 2001 to 2015; the number of births were unaffected by unexpected wins.14 After the 1998 FIFA World Cup a changed sex ratio at birth was not witnessed 9 months on.19 Nine months following a performance improvement of one standard deviation by a European national soccer team at the FIFA World Cup or UEFA Euro Championships, from 1960 to 2016, there was a 0.3% decline in births 9 months on.20
Comparison with other studies
Some studies have linked a surge in births 9 months later to several occasions, such as carnivals, religious events and secular holidays like Christmas and New Year’s Day (January 1). This increase has been attributed to the holiday celebrations, which promoted greater conception through increased sexual activity among the public.1-4 Although exceptions exist, the principle finding of this systematic review, of baby booms 9(±1) months after winning or hosting major sports tournaments, across different sports and continents, is consistent with the mechanism of celebratory sexual intercourse.9 After a team wins, it has been hypothesized that a person’s happiness coincides with a hormonal shift that elevates their desire for sexual activity.21 Large-scale human emotions can therefore have a significant impact on population demographic changes.
Despite the fact that there was no general increase in live births after the Super Bowl,9 the ratio of male to female live births increased nine months later.10 While both the number of births and the male to female live birth ratio increased after the 2010 FIFA World Cup. This indicates that it is useful to consider both the overall number of live births and the births’ male to female ratio (SRB).
Although England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales are separate countries with their own national soccer teams, the United Kingdom was treated as a single entity in one investigation of this phenomenon.20 According to this investigation, there was a 0.3% drop in births 9 months after a national team performance increase of one standard deviation. The 2016 UEFA tournament in which Northern Ireland participated, had a 2% increase in NI births 9 months later, which appears to be in conflict with this investigation.7 The findings of this investigation20 should thus be handled cautiously given how the United Kingdom was treated as a single nation.
The context in which baby booms take place appears to be important, such as when a nation hosts big international sporting events for the first time (e.g. South Africa 2010 FIFA World Cup,11, 12 Japan 2019 Rugby World Cup18), or when it first qualifies for one and does relatively well (Northern Ireland 2016 UEFA Euros7). It is conceivable that during these inaugural tournaments, public excitement is at its peak, increasing the frequency of celebratory sexual intercourse. This may help to explain why France, despite winning the tournament, did not experience a baby boom 9 months after the 1998 FIFA World Cup as it was the country’s second time hosting the tournament and it had previously qualified.19 Unexpected defeats in the Spanish top division la Liga, when fewer births were recorded 9 months later, are another contextual element.14 An unexpected defeat is more likely to have a negative impact on mood than an expected defeat, with probable aftereffects including a reduction in the number of sexual encounters and subsequent births 9 months later.
That a change in the number of babies born or in the sex ratio at birth occurred circa 9 months after major sporting tournaments across different sports and continents suggests a true effect and a common underlying mechanism. This mechanism suggests that euphoria or sadness experienced when a sports team wins or loses coincides with a hormonal change that increases or decreases a person’s desire for sexual activity, which then affects birth rates nine months later.
Strengths and limitations
A noteworthy strength is the methodology, which is transparent and replicable, and does not impose any language restrictions on the search. Our investigation was constrained because we could have overlooked important papers by not searching gray literature.
This study has the same drawbacks as ecological studies, such as its restricted capacity to draw conclusions at the individual level (the ecological fallacy).22 However, it is probable that ecological research is one of the best ways to assess how a population event affects a population outcome.23
Conclusions
With a few exceptions, major American football, Association football (soccer) and Rugby apex tournaments in Africa, North America, Asia and Europe were associated with increases in the number of babies born and/or in the birth sex ratio 9(±1) months following notable team wins and/or hosting the tournament. Related to this, unexpected losses by teams from a premier soccer league were associated with a decline in births 9 months on. The results of this systematic review suggest that sporting events considerably modify birth patterns, which may affect the demand for midwives, doctors, and other healthcare staff as well as resources.
In conclusion, Nelson Mandela was correct when he averred, “Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire, it has the power to unite people in a way that little else does.”24
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
Ethics
Not required as a systematic review of published data.
Funding
None
Competing interests
None declared
Footnotes
The PROSPERO registration number, which is now available, has been added to this version of the manuscript.
References
